Re: Godel's
- From: "elsiemelsi" <cyprinsam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 09:16:13 -0500
AS has been pointed out by the Australian philosopher colin leslie dean
http://gamahucherpress.yellowgum.com/books/philosophy/GODEL5.pdf
godels proof is invalid for 5 reasons
so footnote 48a is really worthless
quote
Gödel is a complete failure as he ends in utter meaninglessness. Godels
theorems are invalid for 5 reasons: he uses the axiom of reducibility-
which is invalid, he uses the axiom of choice, he constructs impredicative
statements - which are invalid ,he miss uses the theory of types, he falls
into 3 paradoxes
--
Message posted using http://www.talkaboutscience.com/group/sci.logic/
More information at http://www.talkaboutscience.com/faq.html
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Godel's note 48a
- From: John Jones
- Re: Godel's note 48a
- References:
- Godel's "note 48a"
- From: John Jones
- Re: Godel's "note 48a"
- From: Frederick Williams
- Godel's "note 48a"
- Prev by Date: Re: Godel's
- Next by Date: Re: Godel's "note 48a"
- Previous by thread: Re: Godel's "note 48a"
- Next by thread: Re: Godel's note 48a
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|