Re: Godel's comments about the "true reason" for incompleteness

On Mar 24, 9:04 am, "R. Srinivasan" <sradh...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I see the point you are making. Let us forget ex falso quodlibet and
consider a simpler example:

Finally! Sheesh! And to think we could have saved ourselves all the
previous confusions of yours about this if ony you had read an
introductory book on this subject.

As to you LATEST attempt, I'll pass for now. You've already wasted too
much of my patience.

MoeBlee
.