Re: Godel's comments about the "true reason" for incompleteness
- From: george <greeneg@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 15:13:14 -0700 (PDT)
On Mar 27, 3:58 am, "R. Srinivasan" <sradh...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Let me try to state a fundamental objection to "arithmetization of
syntax".
Syntax OF WHAT? Arithmetization IN WHAT theory of arithmetic?
You have SKIPPED all the IMPORTANTquestions!
.
- References:
- Godel's comments about the "true reason" for incompleteness
- From: djrt20
- Re: Godel's comments about the "true reason" for incompleteness
- From: R. Srinivasan
- Re: Godel's comments about the "true reason" for incompleteness
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: Godel's comments about the "true reason" for incompleteness
- From: R. Srinivasan
- Re: Godel's comments about the "true reason" for incompleteness
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: Godel's comments about the "true reason" for incompleteness
- From: R. Srinivasan
- Re: Godel's comments about the "true reason" for incompleteness
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: Godel's comments about the "true reason" for incompleteness
- From: R. Srinivasan
- Re: Godel's comments about the "true reason" for incompleteness
- From: george
- Re: Godel's comments about the "true reason" for incompleteness
- From: R. Srinivasan
- Re: Godel's comments about the "true reason" for incompleteness
- From: Marshall
- Re: Godel's comments about the "true reason" for incompleteness
- From: R. Srinivasan
- Godel's comments about the "true reason" for incompleteness
- Prev by Date: Re: Godel's comments about the "true reason" for incompleteness
- Next by Date: Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem
- Previous by thread: Re: Godel's comments about the "true reason" for incompleteness
- Next by thread: Re: Godel's comments about the "true reason" for incompleteness
- Index(es):
