Re: Size Theory.
- From: MoeBlee <jazzmobe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 14:09:59 -0700 (PDT)
On Mar 29, 8:02 am, Zaljo...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Size Theory is set of all sentences entailed ( from first order logic
with identity and the primitive constant Z , and the primitve two
place relation symbole '< ' to denote 'smaller than' ,and the
primitive one place function symbole 'S' to denote 'size') by the non
logical axioms of ZF and the following non logical axioms:
Without the 2-place predicate symbol 'e', how do you define 'subset',
'finite', 'Dedekind finite', 'bijective', 'injective', 'function',
'domain', 'into', and 'U', all of which you use in your axioms.
For such definitions, do you use '<' where we ordinarily use 'e'?
MoeBlee
.
- References:
- Size Theory.
- From: Zaljohar
- Size Theory.
- Prev by Date: Re: Can the 'Turing Problem' be deflated?
- Previous by thread: Re: Size Theory.
- Next by thread: green-acres free movies, free private archive
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|