Re: Can the 'Turing Problem' be deflated?
- From: george <greeneg@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 21:55:27 -0700 (PDT)
On Mar 31, 6:27 pm, J Jones <jonescard...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
'Halt' is the recognition ofWHY do you think YOU get to SAY what "halt" is or means???
a fulfillment of a command.
WE *ALREADY HAVE DEFINITIONS* FOR ALL OUR TERMS!
You do NOT GET to tell US what "halt" means.
WE TELL YOU what "halt" means.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Can the 'Turing Problem' be deflated?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Can the 'Turing Problem' be deflated?
- From: J Jones
- Re: Can the 'Turing Problem' be deflated?
- References:
- Re: Can the 'Turing Problem' be deflated?
- From: george
- Re: Can the 'Turing Problem' be deflated?
- From: J Jones
- Re: Can the 'Turing Problem' be deflated?
- Prev by Date: Re: Size Theory.
- Next by Date: www.pichunter.com high-quality movies and photos. Full archive
- Previous by thread: Re: Can the 'Turing Problem' be deflated?
- Next by thread: Re: Can the 'Turing Problem' be deflated?
- Index(es):