Re: Semantics of First-Order Languages
- From: Aatu Koskensilta <aatu.koskensilta@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2008 09:00:04 GMT
On 2008-04-02, in sci.logic, Thomas Käufl wrote:
please, would you be so kind and tell me what you mean
with "r.e.".
"Recursively enumerable", that is, enumerated by some recursive
function. A set A of naturals, or of objects we can in some suitable
way code as naturals, is recursively enumerable if it is empty or
there exists a computable ("recursive") function f such that A =
{f(0), f(1), f(2), ...}.
--
Aatu Koskensilta (aatu.koskensilta@xxxxxxxxx)
"Wovon man nicht sprechen kann, daruber muss man schweigen"
- Ludwig Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Semantics of First-Order Languages
- From: Thomas Käufl
- Re: Semantics of First-Order Languages
- References:
- Re: Semantics of First-Order Languages
- From: Thomas Käufl
- Re: Semantics of First-Order Languages
- Prev by Date: slutload.com full movie clips. Free galleries
- Next by Date: Re: Semantics of First-Order Languages
- Previous by thread: Re: Semantics of First-Order Languages
- Next by thread: Re: Semantics of First-Order Languages
- Index(es):