Re: Can the 'Turing Problem' be deflated?
- From: J Jones <jonescardiff@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2008 22:25:40 +0100
george wrote:
On Mar 31, 6:27 pm, J Jones <jonescard...@xxxxxxx> wrote:'Halt' is the recognition ofWHY do you think YOU get to SAY what "halt" is or means???
a fulfillment of a command.
WE *ALREADY HAVE DEFINITIONS* FOR ALL OUR TERMS!
You do NOT GET to tell US what "halt" means.
WE TELL YOU what "halt" means.
In any event, a determination of a 'halt' is the recognition of a fulfillment of a command. Please.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Can the 'Turing Problem' be deflated?
- From: george
- Re: Can the 'Turing Problem' be deflated?
- From: Marshall
- Re: Can the 'Turing Problem' be deflated?
- References:
- Re: Can the 'Turing Problem' be deflated?
- From: george
- Re: Can the 'Turing Problem' be deflated?
- From: J Jones
- Re: Can the 'Turing Problem' be deflated?
- From: george
- Re: Can the 'Turing Problem' be deflated?
- Prev by Date: TIME DEGRADATION
- Next by Date: Re: Question regarding incompleteness in formal systems without sufficient power for arithmetic.
- Previous by thread: Re: Can the 'Turing Problem' be deflated?
- Next by thread: Re: Can the 'Turing Problem' be deflated?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|