Re: Liar's Paradox

On Apr 3, 12:13 pm, stevendaryl3...@xxxxxxxxx (Daryl McCullough)
wrote:
Marshall says...



On Apr 3, 11:06 am, stevendaryl3...@xxxxxxxxx (Daryl McCullough)
wrote:
Marshall says...

Um, I'm guessing you're asking leading questions as
part of some sort of pedagogical technique.

Look, you made a post about the Liar Paradox. I don't
think that your post made very much sense. But if you're
not interested in defending it, I'll let it drop.

If you think something I wrote didn't make much sense,
I'd invite you to point out what you object to specifically.

I don't think that would be very fruitful. Let's drop it.

I am disappointed, but I shall respect your wishes.
I hope I may be forgiven for making an intuitive leap,
but please allow me to express the wish that you feel
better as soon as possible.


Marshall
.

Relevant Pages

  • Is it just me, or did something REALLY heinous occur in N.O.?
    ... Everyone's talking about it and some are defending it like it's some ... Another crime of the century, and a crime against humanity, and BUSH is ... Is it being prepared for some sort of Facist takeover? ... It's an absolute HORROR what has just taken place over the last week or ...
    (alt.politics.bush)
  • Re: Liars Paradox
    ... part of some sort of pedagogical technique. ... you made a post about the Liar Paradox. ... I might point out some specific context-dependence, ...
    (sci.logic)
  • Re: Using a Canon EOS-30D for deepsky?
    ... don't feel you have to dignify this sort of utter fuckwittery by defending yourself. ...
    (uk.sci.astronomy)
  • Re: ready yet for M? [YACD]
    ... He tried to trick me into *not* defending myself. ... that sort of reasoning only works on religious nuts. ... annoy or not clever enough to realise that he's just ...
    (rec.games.roguelike.angband)
  • Re: Liars Paradox
    ... Marshall says... ... part of some sort of pedagogical technique. ... you made a post about the Liar Paradox. ...
    (sci.logic)
Quantcast