Re: A consideration concerning the diagonal argument of G. Cantor
- From: WM <mueckenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 02:47:22 -0700 (PDT)
On 3 Apr., 21:43, MoeBlee <jazzm...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Apr 2, 11:23 pm, WM <mueck...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Fortunately most of mathematics is
independent of ZFC.
No it's not. ZFC axiomatizes ordinary mathematics in such fields as
analysis, algebra, and topology.
Yes, but up to now ZFC has not done much harm or damage to these
fields. They a robust enough.
Regards, WM
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: Incompleteness vs. Mechanical Reasoning
- Next by Date: Re: Incompleteness vs. Mechanical Reasoning
- Previous by thread: Re: A consideration concerning the diagonal argument of G. Cantor
- Next by thread: Re: A consideration concerning the diagonal argument of G. Cantor
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading