Re: Incompleteness vs. Mechanical Reasoning
- From: Rupert <rupertmccallum@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 03:41:26 -0700 (PDT)
On Apr 4, 4:46 pm, "R. Srinivasan" <sradh...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Apr 4, 8:06 am, Marshall <marshall.spi...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
A few times lately I've had the experience of mentioning
something about mechanical reasoning and then having
someone mention incompleteness as if that had anything
to do with what I was saying. In fact the attitude seems
to be akin to that woman in the penguin-on-the-telly sketch
who says "there; I've run rings around you logically."
It's puzzled me a good deal.
A thought just occurred to me: could this possibly be
the result of people thinking that incompleteness is
something that affects mechanical systems but not
our brain? Is the idea floating around that the human
mind is somehow capable of doing things not only
that no *current* computer can do, but also that no
possible future computer could ever do? Is that
what's going on here?
How do I say this: I do not subscribe to that hypothesis.
The human mind has free will and is capable of making a genuinely
random decision.
Free choice is different to a random event. See Peter Unger's "Free
Will and Scientiphicalism".
http://as.nyu.edu/docs/IO/1179/freewill.pdf
How do you know that we have free will?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Incompleteness vs. Mechanical Reasoning
- From: R. Srinivasan
- Re: Incompleteness vs. Mechanical Reasoning
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Incompleteness vs. Mechanical Reasoning
- References:
- Incompleteness vs. Mechanical Reasoning
- From: Marshall
- Re: Incompleteness vs. Mechanical Reasoning
- From: R. Srinivasan
- Incompleteness vs. Mechanical Reasoning
- Prev by Date: Re: A consideration concerning the diagonal argument of G. Cantor
- Next by Date: Re: Liar's Paradox
- Previous by thread: Re: Incompleteness vs. Mechanical Reasoning
- Next by thread: Re: Incompleteness vs. Mechanical Reasoning
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|