Re: Can the 'Turing Problem' be deflated?
- From: george <greeneg@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 18:20:31 -0700 (PDT)
On Apr 3, 4:08 pm, J Jones <jonescard...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
The sort of 'machine' you have envisioned on behalf of Turing
Go *** yourself. *I* have not envisioned ***.
YOU are the one who has "envisioned on behalf of Turing."
I actually READ the definition. You just made one up.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Can the 'Turing Problem' be deflated?
- From: J Jones
- Re: Can the 'Turing Problem' be deflated?
- References:
- Re: Can the 'Turing Problem' be deflated?
- From: george
- Re: Can the 'Turing Problem' be deflated?
- From: J Jones
- Re: Can the 'Turing Problem' be deflated?
- From: george
- Re: Can the 'Turing Problem' be deflated?
- From: J Jones
- Re: Can the 'Turing Problem' be deflated?
- From: george
- Re: Can the 'Turing Problem' be deflated?
- From: J Jones
- Re: Can the 'Turing Problem' be deflated?
- Prev by Date: Re: Can the 'Turing Problem' be deflated?
- Next by Date: Re: Liar's Paradox
- Previous by thread: Re: Can the 'Turing Problem' be deflated?
- Next by thread: Re: Can the 'Turing Problem' be deflated?
- Index(es):
