Size Theory. corrected again
- From: Zaljohar@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 05:11:54 -0700 (PDT)
This is the last version of Size theory:
Size Theory is set of all sentences entailed ( from first order logic
with identity '=' and epsilon membership 'e' and the primitive
constant Z , and the primitve two place relation symbole '< ' to
denote 'smaller than' ,and the primitive one place function symbole
'S' to denote 'size') by the non
logical axioms of ZF and the following non logical axioms:
Define: Sa>Sb <->Sb<Sa
Define: x is standard finite <-> ER (R is a well ordering on x
and converse(R) is a well ordering on x)
Define: x is standard infinite <-> ~ x is finite
Axiom1: Z is standard infinite & Z is Dedekindian finite
Axiom2: Sa=Sb <-> Ef(f:a->b, f is bijective)
Axiom3: Sa<Sb -> ~Sb<Sa
Axiom4: Sa<Sb<Sc -> Sa<Sc
Define: a comparable_to b <->
(Ef(f:a->b,f is injective) or Eg(g:b->a,g is injective))
Axiom5: a comparable_to b ->
[Sa<Sb <->(Ef(f:a->b,f is injective) & Af((f:a->b,f is injective) ->
~ f is surjective))]
Define: x is nested <->
Ayz ((yex&zex) -> (y subset_of z or z subset_of y))
Axiom6: SZ=Z
Axiom7: [x is ordinal &
Ay ((y is ordinal & Sy=Sx)->x in y)]->Sx=x
Axiom8: ~ c comparable_to Ux ->
[(Ay(yex-> Sy<Sc) & x is nested & c is infinite dedekindian finite &
Ux is dedekindian infinite) -> SUx <= Sc]
were '<= ' denote 'smaller than or equal'.
/ Theory definition finished.
There is another version of axiom 8 but perhaps its weaker.
Axiom8:
(c is infinite dedekindian finite & x is dedekindian infinite & ~ c
comparable to x) ->
[Ay((y subset_of x & y is infinite dedekindian finite)->Sy<Sc)
->Sx<Sc]
I was contemplating adding another two axioms to this theory:
Axiom of Para-continuity:
Ax (x is dedekindian infinite -> ~Ey (Sx<Sy<SPx))
Define: Sy>>Sx <-> ~Em (Sx<Sm<Sy)
Axiom para-comparability:
Axyzu ((Sy>>Sx & Sz>>Sx & Su>Sz) -> Su>Sy)
One set theoriest say that the theory is VERY likely to be consistent
and he thinks it is a quite interesting idea, but he is wondering
weather there are mathematical consequences of interest.
Zuhair
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Size Theory. corrected again
- From: Zaljohar
- Re: Size Theory. corrected again
- From: lwalke3
- Re: Size Theory. corrected again
- From: Zaljohar
- Re: Size Theory. corrected again
- Prev by Date: Re: Incompleteness vs. Mechanical Reasoning
- Next by Date: Re: All panduks are green
- Previous by thread: Z-Infinity
- Next by thread: Re: Size Theory. corrected again
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|