Re: Wiles did not prove fermats last theorem

Jan Burse schrieb:
elsiemelsi schrieb:
the australian philosopher colin leslie dean points out Wiles did not prove
fermats last theorem as his proof relies upon an ad hoc ad on

Wiles proof relies upon the Taniyama–Shimura–Weil conjecture

This posting shows your total ingnorance.

Gödel talks about incompletness. Therefore when we
proof things, from time to time, we have to add
additional principles.

This is the way math goes. We even might add a
principle because we have not yet a proof for
it from more elementary principles.

This is all daily business of math.

Actually the conjectur seems to be a theorem now.
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Taniyama-ShimuraConjecture.html

Bye

BTW:

You might have a look at:
http://www.amazon.de/Innenwelt-Mathematik-Kultur-beweisenden-Disziplin/dp/321182961X

.

Relevant Pages

  • Wiles did not prove fermats last theorem
    ... the australian philosopher colin leslie dean points out Wiles did not prove ... fermats last theorem as his proof relies upon an ad hoc ad on ... epsilon conjecture. ...
    (sci.logic)
  • Re: Wiles did not prove fermats last theorem
    ... fermats last theorem as his proof relies upon an ad hoc ad on ... Wiles proof relies upon the Taniyama-Shimura-Weil conjecture ...
    (sci.logic)
  • Re: Wiles did not prove fermats last theorem
    ... fermats last theorem as his proof relies upon an ad hoc ad on ... Wiles proof relies upon the Taniyama–Shimura–Weil conjecture ... it from more elementary principles. ... This is all daily business of math. ...
    (sci.logic)