Re: If ZFC is incomplete it can not prove anything
- From: Peter_Smith <ps218@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 01:48:49 -0700 (PDT)
On Apr 27, 3:46 am, "elsiemelsi" <cyprin...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
and peter smith has admitted godel had no notion of what truth is
so tell us
Peter Smith raises his eyes to heaven and counts slowly to twenty .....
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: If ZFC is incomplete it can not prove anything
- From: herbzet
- Re: If ZFC is incomplete it can not prove anything
- References:
- If ZFC is incomplete it can not prove anything
- From: elsiemelsi
- Re: If ZFC is incomplete it can not prove anything
- From: elsiemelsi
- If ZFC is incomplete it can not prove anything
- Prev by Date: The definition of "set' and " membership "
- Next by Date: Re: Claim: We can assume ZFC consistent
- Previous by thread: Re: If ZFC is incomplete it can not prove anything
- Next by thread: Re: If ZFC is incomplete it can not prove anything
- Index(es):
