Re: a Simple definition for 'finite'

On Apr 29, 3:30 pm, Zaljo...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

I already corrected that. So what you say is not applicable to my
correction.
According to my modification on the definition of "total', it doesn't
follow that
if R is total on {z} then we have <z z>eR.

Fine. And my post in response to the other poster was about my remark
that was based on your posts AT THAT TIME. Any subsequent changes you
made to your formulations have no bearing on what I proved based on
your formulations AT THAT TIME.

MoeBlee
.