# sci.logic

**The totality of facts**,*John Jones***Jessica Marie Alba**,*sweet&soft***The suppressed term of negation**,*John Jones***Re: The suppressed term of negation**,*MoeBlee***Re: The suppressed term of negation**,*John Jones***Re: The suppressed term of negation**,*MoeBlee*

**Re: The suppressed term of negation**,*julio***Re: The suppressed term of negation**,*John Jones*

**Re: The suppressed term of negation**,*Jan Burse***Re: The suppressed term of negation**,*William Elliot***Re: The suppressed term of negation**,*Alan Smaill***Re: The suppressed term of negation**,*John Jones*

**an interesting study about how adults reason**,*jonasgensakumiller***Logic, Science, and a Room with a View**,*John Jones***Dedekindian sets**,*Zaljohar***Question about arithmetical systems**,*Herman Jurjus***Re: Question about arithmetical systems**,*William Elliot***Re: Question about arithmetical systems**,*Rupert***Re: Question about arithmetical systems**,*Herman Jurjus***Re: Question about arithmetical systems**,*kleptomaniac666_***Re: Question about arithmetical systems**,*Herman Jurjus***Re: Question about arithmetical systems**,*Aatu Koskensilta***Re: Question about arithmetical systems**,*Herman Jurjus***Re: Question about arithmetical systems**,*Herman Jurjus***Re: Question about arithmetical systems**,*Rupert*

**Re: Question about arithmetical systems**,*Rupert***Re: Question about arithmetical systems**,*Aatu Koskensilta*

**Re: Question about arithmetical systems**,*Aatu Koskensilta*

**Request for Information on Even/Oddness of infinite sets.**,*Scott***Probability of making a choice by a person, on the basis of earlier made choices?**,*Marcin***Children's Magazine and Science Comic Series**,*The Young Scientists***The limit of Entailment**,*John Jones***choice**,*Zaljohar***Re: choice**,*lwalke3***Re: choice**,*Zaljohar***Re: choice**,*Butch Malahide***Re: choice**,*Zaljohar***Re: choice**,*Butch Malahide***Re: choice**,*Zaljohar***Re: choice**,*lwalke3***Re: choice**,*Butch Malahide***Re: choice**,*Zaljohar*

**Solved the Modal logic S3 Riddle**,*translogi***Re: Solved the Modal logic S3 Riddle**,*Ken Pledger***Re: Solved the Modal logic S3 Riddle**,*translogi*

**On "the organization of logical elements"**,*John Jones***Re: On "the organization of logical elements"**,*Jesse F. Hughes***Re: On "the organization of logical elements"**,*David C . Ullrich***Re: On "the organization of logical elements"**,*John Jones***Re: On "the organization of logical elements"**,*Tron***Re: On "the organization of logical elements"**,*John Jones*

**Re: On "the organization of logical elements"**,*MoeBlee***Re: On "the organization of logical elements"**,*John Jones***Re: On "the organization of logical elements"**,*Jesse F. Hughes*

**Re: On "the organization of logical elements"**,*OP***Re: On "the organization of logical elements"**,*John Jones***Re: On "the organization of logical elements"**,*Jan Burse***Re: On "the organization of logical elements"**,*John Jones***Re: On "the organization of logical elements"**,*Jan Burse***Re: On "the organization of logical elements"**,*John Jones***Re: On "the organization of logical elements"**,*Jan Burse***Re: On "the organization of logical elements"**,*John Jones***Re: On "the organization of logical elements"**,*Jan Burse***Re: On "the organization of logical elements"**,*John Jones***Re: On "the organization of logical elements"**,*Jesse F. Hughes***Re: On "the organization of logical elements"**,*John Jones***Re: On "the organization of logical elements"**,*Jesse F. Hughes***Re: On "the organization of logical elements"**,*John Jones***Re: On "the organization of logical elements"**,*Jesse F. Hughes***Re: On "the organization of logical elements"**,*John Jones***Re: On "the organization of logical elements"**,*Jesse F. Hughes***Re: On "the organization of logical elements"**,*John Jones***Re: On "the organization of logical elements"**,*Jesse F. Hughes***Re: On "the organization of logical elements"**,*Marshall***Re: On "the organization of logical elements"**,*Jan Burse***Re: On "the organization of logical elements"**,*Jan Burse***Re: On "the organization of logical elements"**,*Jan Burse***Re: On "the organization of logical elements"**,*John Jones***Re: On "the organization of logical elements"**,*John Jones***Re: On "the organization of logical elements"**,*John Jones***Re: On "the organization of logical elements"**,*Jan Burse***Re: On "the organization of logical elements"**,*John Jones***Re: On "the organization of logical elements"**,*OP*

**Löwenheim–Skolem theorem**,*kleptomaniac666_***Re: Löwenheim–Skolem theorem**,*julio***Re: Löwenheim–Skolem theorem**,*Ross A. Finlayson*

**Re: Löwenheim–Skolem theorem**,*MoeBlee***Re: Löwenheim?Skolem theorem**,*Alan Smaill***Re: Löwenheim–Skolem theorem**,*kleptomaniac666_***Re: Löwenheim–Skolem theorem**,*MoeBlee***Re: Löwenheim–Skolem theorem**,*kleptomaniac666_***Re: Löwenheim–Skolem theorem**,*MoeBlee***Re: Löwenheim–Skolem theorem**,*MoeBlee***Re: Löwenheim?Skolem theorem**,*Alan Smaill***Re: Löwenheim–Skolem theorem**,*MoeBlee***Re: Löwenheim?Skolem theorem**,*Alan Smaill***Re: Löwenheim–Skolem theorem**,*MoeBlee***Re: Re: Löwenheim–Skolem theorem**,*Chris Menzel***Re: Löwenheim–Skolem theorem**,*MoeBlee**Message not available***Re: Löwenheim–Skolem theorem**,*MoeBlee**Message not available***Re: Löwenheim–Skolem theorem**,*MoeBlee**Message not available***Re: Löwenheim?Skolem theorem**,*herbzet***Re: Löwenheim–Skolem theorem**,*Rupert***Re: Löwenheim?Skolem theorem**,*herbzet***Re: Löwenheim–Skolem theorem**,*Rupert***Re: Löwenheim?Skolem theorem**,*herbzet**Message not available***Re: Löwenheim?Skolem theorem**,*Alan Smaill**Message not available***Re: Löwenheim�Skolem theorem**,*Jan Burse***Re: Löwenheim�Skolem theorem**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: Löwenheim�Skolem theorem**,*Jan Burse***Re: Löwenheim-Skolem theorem**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: Löwenheim-Skolem theorem**,*Jan Burse***Re: Löwenheim-Skolem theorem**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: Löwenheim-Skolem theorem**,*Jan Burse***Re: Löwenheim-Skolem theorem**,*Jan Burse***Re: Löwenheim-Skolem theorem**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: Löwenheim-Skolem theorem**,*Jan Burse***Re: Löwenheim�Skolem theorem**,*Jan Burse**Message not available***Re: Löwenheim?Skolem theorem**,*Jan Burse**Message not available***Re: Löwenheim?Skolem theorem**,*Jan Burse**Message not available***Re: Löwenheim?Skolem theorem**,*herbzet**Message not available***Re: Löwenheim?Skolem theorem**,*herbzet***Re: Löwenheim?Skolem theorem**,*Alan Smaill**Message not available***Re: Löwenheim?Skolem theorem**,*Alan Smaill***Re: Löwenheim–Skolem theorem**,*MoeBlee***Re: Re: Löwenheim–Skolem theorem**,*Chris Menzel***Re: Löwenheim–Skolem theorem**,*MoeBlee***Re: Löwenheim?Skolem theorem**,*Alan Smaill*

**Re: Löwenheim–Skolem theorem**,*Rupert*

**First order theory of rationals**,*persres@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx***Re: First order theory of rationals**,*MoeBlee***Re: First order theory of rationals**,*David C . Ullrich***Re: First order theory of rationals**,*Butch Malahide***Re: First order theory of rationals**,*David C . Ullrich***Re: First order theory of rationals**,*george***Re: First order theory of rationals**,*David C . Ullrich***Re: First order theory of rationals**,*george***Re: First order theory of rationals**,*Aatu Koskensilta***Re: First order theory of rationals**,*Chris Menzel***Re: First order theory of rationals**,*george***Re: First order theory of rationals**,*David C . Ullrich***Re: First order theory of rationals**,*george***Re: First order theory of rationals**,*Chris Menzel***Re: First order theory of rationals**,*David C . Ullrich***Re: First order theory of rationals**,*Aatu Koskensilta***Re: First order theory of rationals**,*MoeBlee***Re: First order theory of rationals**,*David C . Ullrich***Re: First order theory of rationals**,*Gc***Re: First order theory of rationals**,*David C . Ullrich***Re: First order theory of rationals**,*Gc***Re: First order theory of rationals**,*MoeBlee***Re: First order theory of rationals**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: First order theory of rationals**,*MoeBlee***Re: First order theory of rationals**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: First order theory of rationals**,*MoeBlee***Re: First order theory of rationals**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: First order theory of rationals**,*MoeBlee***Re: First order theory of rationals**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: First order theory of rationals**,*MoeBlee***Re: First order theory of rationals**,*Chris Menzel***Re: First order theory of rationals**,*Chris Menzel***Re: First order theory of rationals**,*David C . Ullrich***Re: First order theory of rationals**,*David C . Ullrich*

**Re: First order theory of rationals**,*Gc*

**Re: First order theory of rationals**,*george***Re: First order theory of rationals**,*persres@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx*

**Re: First order theory of rationals**,*xianmliu*

**Does Logic allow "an exception to the rule"?**,*John Jones***Re: Does Logic allow "an exception to the rule"?**,*Jesse F. Hughes***Re: Does Logic allow "an exception to the rule"?**,*John Jones***Re: Does Logic allow "an exception to the rule"?**,*Jesse F. Hughes***Re: Does Logic allow "an exception to the rule"?**,*John Jones***Re: Does Logic allow "an exception to the rule"?**,*Jesse F. Hughes***Re: Does Logic allow "an exception to the rule"?**,*John Jones***Re: Does Logic allow "an exception to the rule"?**,*Jesse F. Hughes***Re: Does Logic allow "an exception to the rule"?**,*John Jones***Re: Does Logic allow "an exception to the rule"?**,*Peter_Smith***Re: Does Logic allow "an exception to the rule"?**,*Frederick Williams***Re: Does Logic allow "an exception to the rule"?**,*John Jones***Re: Does Logic allow "an exception to the rule"?**,*MoeBlee***Re: Does Logic allow "an exception to the rule"?**,*Frederick Williams***Re: Does Logic allow "an exception to the rule"?**,*OP***Re: Does Logic allow "an exception to the rule"?**,*John Jones***Re: Does Logic allow "an exception to the rule"?**,*MoeBlee***Re: Does Logic allow "an exception to the rule"?**,*Jan Burse***Re: Does Logic allow "an exception to the rule"?**,*John Jones***Re: Does Logic allow "an exception to the rule"?**,*Marshall*

**the separation axiom is invalid therefore russells paradox stands and set theory is inconsistent**,*elsiemelsi***the separation axiom is rubbish -it leads to inconsistency in ZFC**,*elsiemelsi***Re: the separation axiom is rubbish -it leads to inconsistency in ZFC**,*george***Re: the separation axiom is rubbish -it leads to inconsistency in ZFC**,*Dan Christensen***Re: the separation axiom is rubbish -it leads to inconsistency in ZFC**,*Frederick Williams*

**Re: A term to describe "everything"?**,*Jan Burse***Re: A term to describe "everything"?**,*kleptomaniac666_***Re: A term to describe "everything"?**,*kleptomaniac666_***Re: A term to describe "everything"?**,*Chris Menzel*

**Re: A term to describe "everything"?**,*herbzet*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: A term to describe "everything"?**,*Jesse F. Hughes*

**A source in ZFC for its inconsistency ie the skolem paradox**,*elsiemelsi***Re: A source in ZFC for its inconsistency ie the skolem paradox**,*Jan Burse***Re: A source in ZFC for its inconsistency ie the skolem paradox**,*elsiemelsi***Re: A source in ZFC for its inconsistency ie the skolem paradox**,*Jan Burse***Re: A source in ZFC for its inconsistency ie the skolem paradox**,*elsiemelsi***Re: A source in ZFC for its inconsistency ie the skolem paradox**,*Jan Burse***Re: A source in ZFC for its inconsistency ie the skolem paradox**,*elsiemelsi*

**Silly question about the Socrates syllogism**,*Dan Christensen***Re: Silly question about the Socrates syllogism**,*John Jones***Re: Silly question about the Socrates syllogism**,*Jesse F. Hughes***Re: Silly question about the Socrates syllogism**,*John Jones*

**Re: Silly question about the Socrates syllogism**,*herbzet***Re: Silly question about the Socrates syllogism**,*herbzet***Re: Silly question about the Socrates syllogism**,*Dan Christensen*

**Re: Silly question about the Socrates syllogism**,*holden_owen***Re: Silly question about the Socrates syllogism**,*Jesse F. Hughes*

**Re: Silly question about the Socrates syllogism**,*PiperAlpha167*

**what is the difference between a mapping and a relationship?**,*John Jones***Re: what is the difference between a mapping and a relationship?**,*Jan Burse***Re: what is the difference between a mapping and a relationship?**,*Jan Burse***Re: what is the difference between a mapping and a relationship?**,*Jan Burse***Re: what is the difference between a mapping and a relationship?**,*John Jones***Re: what is the difference between a mapping and a relationship?**,*Jan Burse***Re: what is the difference between a mapping and a relationship?**,*John Jones***Re: what is the difference between a mapping and a relationship?**,*MoeBlee***Re: what is the difference between a mapping and a relationship?**,*John Jones***Re: what is the difference between a mapping and a relationship?**,*MoeBlee***Re: what is the difference between a mapping and a relationship?**,*MoeBlee***Re: what is the difference between a mapping and a relationship?**,*Jan Burse***Re: what is the difference between a mapping and a relationship?**,*Jan Burse***Re: what is the difference between a mapping and a relationship?**,*John Jones***Re: what is the difference between a mapping and a relationship?**,*MoeBlee***Re: what is the difference between a mapping and a relationship?**,*Jesse F. Hughes***Re: what is the difference between a mapping and a relationship?**,*John Jones***Re: what is the difference between a mapping and a relationship?**,*MoeBlee***Re: what is the difference between a mapping and a relationship?**,*John Jones***Re: what is the difference between a mapping and a relationship?**,*Jan Burse***Re: what is the difference between a mapping and a relationship?**,*John Jones***Re: what is the difference between a mapping and a relationship?**,*MoeBlee***Re: what is the difference between a mapping and a relationship?**,*John Jones***Re: what is the difference between a mapping and a relationship?**,*MoeBlee***Re: what is the difference between a mapping and a relationship?**,*Jesse F. Hughes***Re: what is the difference between a mapping and a relationship?**,*John Jones***Re: what is the difference between a mapping and a relationship?**,*Jesse F. Hughes***Re: what is the difference between a mapping and a relationship?**,*John Jones***Re: what is the difference between a mapping and a relationship?**,*MoeBlee***Re: what is the difference between a mapping and a relationship?**,*John Jones***Re: what is the difference between a mapping and a relationship?**,*Jan Burse***Re: what is the difference between a mapping and a relationship?**,*John Jones***Re: what is the difference between a mapping and a relationship?**,*Jan Burse***Re: what is the difference between a mapping and a relationship?**,*Jan Burse***Re: what is the difference between a mapping and a relationship?**,*Jan Burse***Re: what is the difference between a mapping and a relationship?**,*John Jones***Re: what is the difference between a mapping and a relationship?**,*John Jones***Re: what is the difference between a mapping and a relationship?**,*Jan Burse***Re: what is the difference between a mapping and a relationship?**,*John Jones***Re: what is the difference between a mapping and a relationship?**,*Jan Burse***Re: what is the difference between a mapping and a relationship?**,*John Jones***Re: what is the difference between a mapping and a relationship?**,*Jan Burse***Re: what is the difference between a mapping and a relationship?**,*John Jones***Re: what is the difference between a mapping and a relationship?**,*Jan Burse***Re: what is the difference between a mapping and a relationship?**,*John Jones***Re: what is the difference between a mapping and a relationship?**,*John Jones***Re: what is the difference between a mapping and a relationship?**,*MoeBlee***Re: what is the difference between a mapping and a relationship?**,*John Jones***Re: what is the difference between a mapping and a relationship?**,*MoeBlee***Re: what is the difference between a mapping and a relationship?**,*Jan Burse***Re: what is the difference between a mapping and a relationship?**,*Jan Burse***Re: what is the difference between a mapping and a relationship?**,*Jan Burse*

**Re: what is the difference between a mapping and a relationship?**,*William Elliot***Re: what is the difference between a mapping and a relationship?**,*John Jones***Re: what is the difference between a mapping and a relationship?**,*MoeBlee***Re: what is the difference between a mapping and a relationship?**,*MoeBlee***Re: what is the difference between a mapping and a relationship?**,*John Jones***Re: what is the difference between a mapping and a relationship?**,*MoeBlee***Re: what is the difference between a mapping and a relationship?**,*John Jones***Re: what is the difference between a mapping and a relationship?**,*MoeBlee***Re: what is the difference between a mapping and a relationship?**,*John Jones***Re: what is the difference between a mapping and a relationship?**,*MoeBlee***Re: what is the difference between a mapping and a relationship?**,*John Jones*

**Newbie logic questions**,*priscila***Re: Newbie logic questions**,*Jan Burse***Re: Newbie logic questions**,*Jan Burse***Re: Newbie logic questions**,*herbzet***Re: Newbie logic questions**,*herbzet***Re: Newbie logic questions**,*Jan Burse*

**Re: Newbie logic questions**,*herbzet***Re: Newbie logic questions**,*Frederick Williams***Re: Newbie logic questions**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: Newbie logic questions**,*Nam D. Nguyen*

**Re: Newbie logic questions**,*Frederick Williams***Can be regarded as the definition of "false"**,*Franz Binder***Re: Newbie logic questions**,*Chris Menzel***Re: Newbie logic questions**,*herbzet***Re: Newbie logic questions**,*herbzet***Re: Newbie logic questions**,*priscila***Re: Newbie logic questions**,*herbzet***Re: Newbie logic questions**,*Marshall***Re: Newbie logic questions**,*herbzet*

**Logic question**,*John Jones***Re: Logic question**,*Jan Burse***Re: Logic question**,*John Jones***Re: Logic question**,*Jan Burse*

**Re: Logic question**,*Frederick Williams*

**I'm dying to get into that car.**,*Anonymous Sender***Theories that prove their own consistency**,*Gc***Theorem II.8.10 (SOSOA): maybe interesting result, probably wrong proof**,*Jan Burse***Sexy model fingering her *** hard**,*karnaval***Asian Pilar gets a facial prize**,*karnaval****** tight oiled black teen spread eagle**,*karnaval***Sweet teen gets double teamed**,*karnaval***Latina cutie drowned by elephant cock**,*karnaval***Teen girl plugged in ***and being spermed**,*karnaval***Brunette beauty enjoys ***ual experience**,*karnaval***Horny chubby chick enjoying a good*****,*svist******star dominica leoni blowjobs***ed**,*svist***Japanese Girl Gets Tits***ed**,*svist***Amateur Babe Haley Sucking Cock**,*svist***Sweet Asian Girl Licks And Swallows**,*svist***Racy Red Gives Good Oral***ing**,*svist***Toon Chick Gets Condom***ing**,*svist***Lusty Grannies Get Cum In Groupsex**,*svist***Hot Black Teen Amateur Sucking Cock**,*svist***How to prove a categorical fallacy using predicate logic?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: How to prove a categorical fallacy using predicate logic?**,*MoeBlee***Re: How to prove a categorical fallacy using predicate logic?**,*Chris Menzel***Re: How to prove a categorical fallacy using predicate logic?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: How to prove a categorical fallacy using predicate logic?**,*Chris Menzel***Re: How to prove a categorical fallacy using predicate logic?**,*PiperAlpha167***Re: How to prove a categorical fallacy using predicate logic?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: How to prove a categorical fallacy using predicate logic?**,*PiperAlpha167*

**Re: How to prove a categorical fallacy using predicate logic?**,*herbzet***Re: How to prove a categorical fallacy using predicate logic?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: How to prove a categorical fallacy using predicate logic?**,*julio*

**System P is Godels meta theory not his object theory**,*elsiemelsi***Blonde ebony fox enjoys sucking down sausage**,*domovoi***Re: Blonde ebony fox enjoys etc.**,*herbzet*

**Question Regarding Cardinality among sets.**,*Scott***Re: Question Regarding Cardinality among sets.**,*herbzet***Re: Question Regarding Cardinality among sets.**,*herbzet***Re: Question Regarding Cardinality among sets.**,*Norman Megill***Re: Question Regarding Cardinality among sets.**,*Scott***Re: Question Regarding Cardinality among sets.**,*Arturo Magidin***Re: Question Regarding Cardinality among sets.**,*Scott***Re: Question Regarding Cardinality among sets.**,*MoeBlee***Re: Question Regarding Cardinality among sets.**,*Scott***Re: Question Regarding Cardinality among sets.**,*Scott***Re: Question Regarding Cardinality among sets.**,*Arturo Magidin***Re: Question Regarding Cardinality among sets.**,*george***Re: Question Regarding Cardinality among sets.**,*MoeBlee***Re: Question Regarding Cardinality among sets.**,*Scott***Re: Question Regarding Cardinality among sets.**,*Arturo Magidin***Re: Question Regarding Cardinality among sets.**,*Scott***Re: Question Regarding Cardinality among sets.**,*Arturo Magidin***Re: Question Regarding Cardinality among sets.**,*MoeBlee***Re: Question Regarding Cardinality among sets.**,*herbzet***Re: Question Regarding Cardinality among sets.**,*george***Re: Question Regarding Cardinality among sets.**,*herbzet*

**Re: Question Regarding Cardinality among sets.**,*Scott*

**Re: Question Regarding Cardinality among sets.**,*george***Re: Question Regarding Cardinality among sets.**,*george*

**Blonde With Huge Boobs Ass Rammed**,*buhletergh***Probability and quantum outcome**,*J Jones***Re: Probability and quantum outcome**,*Alan Smaill*

**Induction in second order arithmetic**,*kleptomaniac666_***Re: Induction in second order arithmetic**,*Rupert***Re: Induction in second order arithmetic**,*Aatu Koskensilta***Re: Induction in second order arithmetic**,*kleptomaniac666_***Re: Induction in second order arithmetic**,*Aatu Koskensilta***Re: Induction in second order arithmetic**,*kleptomaniac666_***Re: Induction in second order arithmetic**,*Aatu Koskensilta***Re: Induction in second order arithmetic**,*kleptomaniac666_***Re: Induction in second order arithmetic**,*Aatu Koskensilta*

**Re: Induction in second order arithmetic**,*george***Re: Induction in second order arithmetic**,*kleptomaniac666_***Re: Induction in second order arithmetic**,*george***Re: Induction in second order arithmetic**,*kleptomaniac666_***Re: Induction in second order arithmetic**,*george***Re: Induction in second order arithmetic**,*kleptomaniac666_***Re: Induction in second order arithmetic**,*george***Re: Induction in second order arithmetic**,*Aatu Koskensilta***Re: Induction in second order arithmetic**,*george***Re: Induction in second order arithmetic**,*Aatu Koskensilta***Re: Induction in second order arithmetic**,*Aatu Koskensilta***Re: Induction in second order arithmetic**,*Chris Menzel***Re: Induction in second order arithmetic**,*george***Re: Induction in second order arithmetic**,*Aatu Koskensilta***Re: Induction in second order arithmetic**,*kleptomaniac666_***Re: Induction in second order arithmetic**,*kleptomaniac666_***Re: Induction in second order arithmetic**,*Rupert***Re: Induction in second order arithmetic**,*kleptomaniac666_***Re: Induction in second order arithmetic**,*Rupert***Re: Induction in second order arithmetic**,*kleptomaniac666_***Re: Induction in second order arithmetic**,*Rupert***Re: Induction in second order arithmetic**,*kleptomaniac666_***Re: Induction in second order arithmetic**,*Rupert***Re: Induction in second order arithmetic**,*george***Re: Induction in second order arithmetic**,*kleptomaniac666_***Re: Induction in second order arithmetic**,*Aatu Koskensilta***Re: Induction in second order arithmetic**,*kleptomaniac666_***Re: Induction in second order arithmetic**,*Rupert*

**Re: Induction in second order arithmetic**,*Aatu Koskensilta***Re: Induction in second order arithmetic**,*george***Re: Induction in second order arithmetic**,*Aatu Koskensilta*

**Protect yourself against Operation Sudden Fall**,*Simon . Dario***Godel makes 2 deceitful moves in his imcompleteness theorem proof**,*elsiemelsi***Godel use peano which is impredicative-thus theorem invalid**,*elsiemelsi***Mortal man -- Truth or belief??**,*Rupee*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Mortal man -- Truth or belief??**,*Rupee*

**Stupid Predicate Tricks**,*eternalsquire***Re: Stupid Predicate Tricks**,*William Hale*

**primitive recursive: obsolete?**,*Marshall***Re: primitive recursive: obsolete?**,*Chris Menzel***Re: primitive recursive: obsolete?**,*MoeBlee***Re: primitive recursive: obsolete?**,*Marshall***Re: primitive recursive: obsolete?**,*MoeBlee*

**Re: primitive recursive: obsolete?**,*MoeBlee***Re: primitive recursive: obsolete?**,*herbzet***Re: primitive recursive: obsolete?**,*Chris Menzel***Re: primitive recursive: obsolete?**,*Marshall***Re: primitive recursive: obsolete?**,*William Hale***Re: primitive recursive: obsolete?**,*Marshall***Re: primitive recursive: obsolete?**,*Chris Menzel***Re: primitive recursive: obsolete?**,*Chris Menzel***Re: primitive recursive: obsolete?**,*Aatu Koskensilta***Re: primitive recursive: obsolete?**,*Chris Menzel***Re: primitive recursive: obsolete?**,*Aatu Koskensilta***Re: primitive recursive: obsolete?**,*Chris Menzel***Re: primitive recursive: obsolete?**,*herbzet***Re: primitive recursive: obsolete?**,*Chris Menzel***Re: primitive recursive: obsolete?**,*MoeBlee***Re: primitive recursive: obsolete?**,*Chris Menzel***Re: primitive recursive: obsolete?**,*Aatu Koskensilta***Re: primitive recursive: obsolete?**,*Nam D. Nguyen***Re: primitive recursive: obsolete?**,*MoeBlee***Re: primitive recursive: obsolete?**,*Nam D. Nguyen***Re: primitive recursive: obsolete?**,*MoeBlee***Re: primitive recursive: obsolete?**,*Nam D. Nguyen***Re: primitive recursive: obsolete?**,*MoeBlee***Re: primitive recursive: obsolete?**,*Nam D. Nguyen***Re: primitive recursive: obsolete?**,*MoeBlee***Re: primitive recursive: obsolete?**,*Nam D. Nguyen***Re: primitive recursive: obsolete?**,*Aatu Koskensilta***Re: primitive recursive: obsolete?**,*MoeBlee***Re: primitive recursive: obsolete?**,*MoeBlee***Re: primitive recursive: obsolete?**,*pboparis***Re: primitive recursive: obsolete?**,*abo***Re: primitive recursive: obsolete?**,*LauLuna***Re: primitive recursive: obsolete?**,*MoeBlee***Re: primitive recursive: obsolete?**,*MoeBlee*

**Re: primitive recursive: obsolete?**,*MoeBlee***Re: primitive recursive: obsolete?**,*Aatu Koskensilta*

**Question on Logic from Michael Potter lecture**,*J Jones***Proof verifier can verify itself: a riddle**,*Jan Burse***Re: Proof verifier can verify itself: a riddle**,*Marshall***Re: Proof verifier can verify itself: a riddle**,*Aatu Koskensilta*

**The Idiots' Paradox**,*William Elliot***Sunbeams on Our Faith**,*abra . ricerca***A hermeneutic disproof of Godel's incompleteness theorem**,*elsiemelsi***Re: A hermeneutic disproof of Godel's incompleteness theorem**,*Rupert***Re: A hermeneutic disproof of Godel's incompleteness theorem**,*elsiemelsi***Re: A hermeneutic disproof of Godel's incompleteness theorem**,*Rupert***Re: A hermeneutic disproof of Godel's incompleteness theorem**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: A hermeneutic disproof of Godel's incompleteness theorem**,*Rupert***Re: A hermeneutic disproof of Godel's incompleteness theorem**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: A hermeneutic disproof of Godel's incompleteness theorem**,*herbzet***Re: A hermeneutic disproof of Godel's incompleteness theorem**,*Rupert*

**Re: A hermeneutic disproof of Godel's incompleteness theorem**,*elsiemelsi*

**Re: A hermeneutic disproof of Godel's incompleteness theorem**,*elsiemelsi***Re: A hermeneutic disproof of Godel's incompleteness theorem**,*Charlie-Boo*

**hermeneutic disproof of godels incompleteness theorem**,*elsiemelsi***Computers vs. Pebbles**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Computers vs. Pebbles**,*Aatu Koskensilta***Re: Computers vs. Pebbles**,*Nam D. Nguyen***Re: Computers vs. Pebbles**,*Aatu Koskensilta***Re: Computers vs. Pebbles**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Computers vs. Pebbles**,*Aatu Koskensilta***Re: Computers vs. Pebbles**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Computers vs. Pebbles**,*Nam D. Nguyen***Re: Computers vs. Pebbles**,*Charlie-Boo*

**Re: Computers vs. Pebbles**,*Charlie-Boo*

**Re: Computers vs. Pebbles**,*Jan Burse***Re: Computers vs. Pebbles**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Computers vs. Pebbles**,*Charlie-Boo*

**Re: Computers vs. Pebbles**,*J Jones***Re: Computers vs. Pebbles**,*Jesse F. Hughes***Re: Computers vs. Pebbles**,*Jesse F. Hughes***Re: Computers vs. Pebbles**,*William Elliot***Re: Computers vs. Pebbles**,*Jesse F. Hughes***Re: Computers vs. Pebbles**,*William Elliot***Re: Computers vs. Pebbles**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Computers vs. Pebbles**,*William Elliot***Re: Computers vs. Pebbles**,*Jesse F. Hughes***Re: Computers vs. Pebbles**,*William Elliot***Re: Computers vs. Pebbles**,*Marshall***Re: Computers vs. Pebbles**,*William Elliot***Re: Computers vs. Pebbles**,*Marshall*

**Re: Computers vs. Pebbles**,*William Elliot*

**Re: Mathematics is systems of epistemological holisim**,*Rupert***question about "Subsystems of Second Order Arithmetic"**,*Rupert***Re: question about "Subsystems of Second Order Arithmetic"**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: question about "Subsystems of Second Order Arithmetic"**,*Rupert***Re: question about "Subsystems of Second Order Arithmetic"**,*David C . Ullrich***Re: question about "Subsystems of Second Order Arithmetic"**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: question about "Subsystems of Second Order Arithmetic"**,*Aatu Koskensilta***Re: question about "Subsystems of Second Order Arithmetic"**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: question about "Subsystems of Second Order Arithmetic"**,*David C . Ullrich***Re: question about "Subsystems of Second Order Arithmetic"**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: question about "Subsystems of Second Order Arithmetic"**,*MoeBlee***Re: question about "Subsystems of Second Order Arithmetic"**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: question about "Subsystems of Second Order Arithmetic"**,*David C . Ullrich*

**Re: question about "Subsystems of Second Order Arithmetic"**,*Charlie-Boo*

**How To Get Saved**,*Pastor Page***Re: Why Some Sentences Lack Truth Values**,*Jesse F. Hughes*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: Why Some Sentences Lack Truth Values**,*Jesse F. Hughes***Re: Why Some Sentences Lack Truth Values**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Why Some Sentences Lack Truth Values**,*Jesse F. Hughes*

**Re: Why Some Sentences Lack Truth Values**,*Newberry***Re: Why Some Sentences Lack Truth Values**,*Jesse F. Hughes***Re: Why Some Sentences Lack Truth Values**,*Tron***Re: Why Some Sentences Lack Truth Values**,*Jesse F. Hughes*

**Re: Why Some Sentences Lack Truth Values**,*Jesse F. Hughes***Re: Why Some Sentences Lack Truth Values**,*Newberry***Re: Why Some Sentences Lack Truth Values**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: Why Some Sentences Lack Truth Values**,*Newberry***Re: Why Some Sentences Lack Truth Values**,*Jesse F. Hughes***Re: Why Some Sentences Lack Truth Values**,*Newberry***Re: Why Some Sentences Lack Truth Values**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: Why Some Sentences Lack Truth Values**,*Newberry***Re: Why Some Sentences Lack Truth Values**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: Why Some Sentences Lack Truth Values**,*Newberry***Re: Why Some Sentences Lack Truth Values**,*MoeBlee***Re: Why Some Sentences Lack Truth Values**,*Jesse F. Hughes***Re: Why Some Sentences Lack Truth Values**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: Why Some Sentences Lack Truth Values**,*Newberry***Re: Why Some Sentences Lack Truth Values**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: Why Some Sentences Lack Truth Values**,*Newberry***Re: Why Some Sentences Lack Truth Values**,*Jesse F. Hughes***Re: Why Some Sentences Lack Truth Values**,*Jesse F. Hughes***Re: Why Some Sentences Lack Truth Values**,*Newberry***Re: Why Some Sentences Lack Truth Values**,*Jesse F. Hughes***Re: Why Some Sentences Lack Truth Values**,*Jesse F. Hughes***Re: Why Some Sentences Lack Truth Values**,*Jesse F. Hughes*

**Re: Why Some Sentences Lack Truth Values**,*Jesse F. Hughes***Re: Why Some Sentences Lack Truth Values**,*Jesse F. Hughes*

**Godels incompleteness theorem is invalid as he constructs vicious circle statements**,*elsiemelsi***Re: Godels incompleteness theorem is invalid as he constructs vicious circle statements**,*Charlie-Boo*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Godels incompleteness theorem is invalid as he constructs vicious circle statements**,*elsiemelsi*

**48 year old Woman in Knoxville, Tennessee**,*iveycarollay***The intuitive basis of set size**,*Zaljohar***Jewellery**,*كول***Pseudo Negation - A Formal Definition of "As Strong as Arithmetic"**,*Nam D. Nguyen***Size theory.**,*Zaljohar***Re: Size theory.**,*Zaljohar***Re: Size theory.**,*lwalke3*

**Re: Size theory.**,*J Jones*

**finite**,*Zaljohar***Re: finite**,*MoeBlee***Re: finite**,*Zaljohar*

**jesus images**,*tamilvijay3***Science Comic Series For Creative Children Published from Singapore**,*The Young Scientists***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*Gene Ledbetter***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*J Jones***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*Jesse F. Hughes***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*J Jones***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*Jesse F. Hughes***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*Marshall***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*J Jones***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*Jesse F. Hughes***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*J Jones***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*Jesse F. Hughes***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*J Jones***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*Marshall***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*J Jones***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*Marshall***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*J Jones***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*Marshall***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*Jesse F. Hughes***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*Marshall***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*J Jones***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*Marshall***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*J Jones***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*Peter_Smith***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*J Jones***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*Alan Smaill***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*Marshall***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*ChefMo***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*Alan Smaill***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*J Jones***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*J Jones***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*Alan Smaill***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*J Jones***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*Marshall***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*J Jones***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*Marshall***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*J Jones***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*Jesse F. Hughes***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*J Jones***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*Jesse F. Hughes***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*herbzet***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*J Jones***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*Jesse F. Hughes***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*J Jones***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*Jesse F. Hughes***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*J Jones***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*Marshall***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*J Jones***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*J Jones***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*Jesse F. Hughes***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*Jesse F. Hughes***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*J Jones***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*Marshall***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*J Jones***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*Marshall***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*J Jones***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*Jesse F. Hughes***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*J Jones***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*Jesse F. Hughes***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*J Jones***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*Jesse F. Hughes***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*J Jones***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*Marshall***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*J Jones***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*Jesse F. Hughes***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*J Jones***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*Jesse F. Hughes***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*J Jones***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*Jesse F. Hughes***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*J Jones***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*Jesse F. Hughes***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*J Jones***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*Jesse F. Hughes***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*J Jones***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*Jesse F. Hughes***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*J Jones***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*J Jones***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*J Jones***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*Jesse F. Hughes***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*J Jones***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*Jesse F. Hughes***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*J Jones***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*Jesse F. Hughes***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*J Jones***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*Alan Smaill***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*J Jones***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*Marshall***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*herbzet***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*J Jones***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*Jesse F. Hughes***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*J Jones***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*Jesse F. Hughes***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*Marshall***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*Peter_Smith***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*J Jones***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*J Jones***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*Jesse F. Hughes***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*J Jones***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*Jesse F. Hughes***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*J Jones***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*Jesse F. Hughes***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*J Jones***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*Alan Smaill***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*J Jones***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*Alan Smaill***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*J Jones***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*Jesse F. Hughes***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*J Jones***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*Jesse F. Hughes***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*OP***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*J Jones***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*J Jones***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*Jesse F. Hughes***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*Gene Ledbetter***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*Gene Ledbetter***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*Jesse F. Hughes***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*J Jones*

**Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*LauLuna*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*J Jones***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*Jesse F. Hughes*

**Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*LauLuna***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*Daryl McCullough*

**Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*LauLuna***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*Jesse F. Hughes***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*LauLuna***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*Jesse F. Hughes***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*J Jones***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*LauLuna***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*J Jones***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*LauLuna***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*Marshall***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*J Jones***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*James Burns***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*LauLuna***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*J Jones***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*LauLuna***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*Jim Burns***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*Marshall***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*LauLuna***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*J Jones***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*herbzet***Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem**,*herbzet*

**please help verify this proof**,*chalong08***Re: please help verify this proof**,*smn***Re: please help verify this proof**,*David C . Ullrich*

**Re: All panduks are green**,*Newberry***Re: All panduks are green**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: All panduks are green**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: All panduks are green**,*Newberry***Re: All panduks are green**,*MoeBlee***Re: All panduks are green**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: All panduks are green**,*Newberry***Re: All panduks are green**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: All panduks are green**,*Newberry***Re: All panduks are green**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: All panduks are green**,*Newberry***Re: All panduks are green**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: All panduks are green**,*Newberry***Re: All panduks are green**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: All panduks are green**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: All panduks are green**,*Newberry***Re: All panduks are green**,*Newberry***Re: All panduks are green**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: All panduks are green**,*Newberry***Re: All panduks are green**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: All panduks are green**,*Newberry***Re: All panduks are green**,*Jesse F. Hughes***Re: All panduks are green**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: All panduks are green**,*Newberry***Re: All panduks are green**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: All panduks are green**,*Newberry***Re: All panduks are green**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: All panduks are green**,*Newberry***Re: All panduks are green**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: All panduks are green**,*Newberry***Re: All panduks are green**,*Marshall***Re: All panduks are green**,*Newberry***Re: All panduks are green**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: All panduks are green**,*Newberry***Re: All panduks are green**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: All panduks are green**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: All panduks are green**,*Newberry***Re: All panduks are green**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: All panduks are green**,*Newberry***Re: All panduks are green**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: All panduks are green**,*Newberry***Re: All panduks are green**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: All panduks are green**,*Newberry***Re: All panduks are green**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: All panduks are green**,*Newberry***Re: All panduks are green**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: All panduks are green**,*Newberry***Re: All panduks are green**,*Jesse F. Hughes***Re: All panduks are green**,*Marshall***Re: All panduks are green**,*Newberry***Re: All panduks are green**,*Jesse F. Hughes***Re: All panduks are green**,*Marshall***Re: All panduks are green**,*Jesse F. Hughes***Re: All panduks are green**,*Marshall***Re: All panduks are green**,*Jesse F. Hughes***Re: All panduks are green**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: All panduks are green**,*Jesse F. Hughes***Re: All panduks are green**,*Newberry***Re: All panduks are green**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: All panduks are green**,*Aatu Koskensilta***Re: All panduks are green**,*Newberry***Re: All panduks are green**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: All panduks are green**,*MoeBlee***Re: All panduks are green**,*Newberry***Re: All panduks are green**,*Marshall***Re: All panduks are green**,*Newberry***Re: All panduks are green**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: All panduks are green**,*Newberry***Re: All panduks are green**,*Jesse F. Hughes***Re: All panduks are green**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: All panduks are green**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: All panduks are green**,*Newberry***Re: All panduks are green**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: All panduks are green**,*Newberry***Re: All panduks are green**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: All panduks are green**,*Newberry***Re: All panduks are green**,*Aatu Koskensilta***Re: All panduks are green**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: All panduks are green**,*Newberry***Re: All panduks are green**,*MoeBlee***Re: All panduks are green**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: All panduks are green**,*Jesse F. Hughes***Re: All panduks are green**,*Jesse F. Hughes***Re: All panduks are green**,*Jesse F. Hughes***Re: All panduks are green**,*Jesse F. Hughes***Re: All panduks are green**,*Jesse F. Hughes***Re: All panduks are green**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: All panduks are green**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: All panduks are green**,*Nam D. Nguyen***Re: All panduks are green**,*Jesse F. Hughes***Re: All panduks are green**,*Nam D. Nguyen***Re: All panduks are green**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: All panduks are green**,*Nam D. Nguyen***Re: All panduks are green**,*Newberry***Re: All panduks are green**,*Nam D. Nguyen***Re: All panduks are green**,*Newberry***Re: All panduks are green**,*Nam D. Nguyen***Re: All panduks are green**,*MoeBlee*

- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: All panduks are green**,*Newberry***Re: All panduks are green**,*Daryl McCullough*

**Re: All panduks are green**,*Frederick Williams***Re: All panduks are green**,*Newberry*

**Re: All panduks are green**,*R. Srinivasan***Re: All panduks are green**,*MoeBlee***Re: All panduks are green**,*R. Srinivasan*

**Re: In need of the all-out revision of symbolic logic**,*Eukie_M_SHIRAISHI***Re: In need of the all-out revision of symbolic logic**,*ST***Re: In need of the all-out revision of symbolic logic**,*herbzet***Re: In need of the all-out revision of symbolic logic**,*Eukie_M_SHIRAISHI***Re: In need of the all-out revision of symbolic logic**,*herbzet***Re: In need of the all-out revision of symbolic logic**,*Eukie_M_SHIRAISHI***Re: In need of the all-out revision of symbolic logic**,*herbzet***Re: In need of the all-out revision of symbolic logic**,*Eukie_M_SHIRAISHI***Re: In need of the all-out revision of symbolic logic**,*Eukie_M_SHIRAISHI***Re: In need of the all-out revision of symbolic logic**,*Jan Burse***Re: In need of the all-out revision of symbolic logic**,*Eukie_M_SHIRAISHI***Re: In need of the all-out revision of symbolic logic**,*Eukie_M_SHIRAISHI*

- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: In need of the all-out revision of symbolic logic**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: In need of the all-out revision of symbolic logic**,*herbzet***Re: In need of the all-out revision of symbolic logic**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: In need of the all-out revision of symbolic logic**,*herbzet***Re: In need of the all-out revision of symbolic logic**,*Eukie_M_SHIRAISHI*

**Re: In need of the all-out revision of symbolic logic**,*Eukie_M_SHIRAISHI*

**[FAQ, 06/11/05] Mathematical logic on the web**,*Boris 'pi' Piwinger***Re: a Simple definition for 'finite'**,*Zaljohar***Re: Question for proof theory specialist: use of inconsistency detectable?**,*george*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: Question for proof theory specialist: use of inconsistency detectable?**,*george***Re: Question for proof theory specialist: use of inconsistency detectable?**,*george***Re: Question for proof theory specialist: use of inconsistency detectable?**,*Jan Burse***Re: Question for proof theory specialist: use of inconsistency detectable?**,*george***Re: Question for proof theory specialist: use of inconsistency detectable?**,*Jan Burse***Re: Question for proof theory specialist: use of inconsistency detectable?**,*george***Re: Question for proof theory specialist: use of inconsistency detectable?**,*Jan Burse***Re: Question for proof theory specialist: use of inconsistency detectable?**,*george***Re: Question for proof theory specialist: use of inconsistency detectable?**,*Aatu Koskensilta***Re: Question for proof theory specialist: use of inconsistency detectable?**,*Nam D. Nguyen***Re: Question for proof theory specialist: use of inconsistency detectable?**,*george***Re: Question for proof theory specialist: use of inconsistency detectable?**,*Jan Burse***Re: Question for proof theory specialist: use of inconsistency detectable?**,*george***Re: Question for proof theory specialist: use of inconsistency detectable?**,*Jan Burse***Re: Question for proof theory specialist: use of inconsistency detectable?**,*tm1162***Re: Question for proof theory specialist: use of inconsistency detectable?**,*tm1162***Re: Question for proof theory specialist: use of inconsistency detectable?**,*Aatu Koskensilta***Re: Question for proof theory specialist: use of inconsistency detectable?**,*george***Re: Question for proof theory specialist: use of inconsistency detectable?**,*Jan Burse***Re: Question for proof theory specialist: use of inconsistency detectable?**,*Alan Smaill***Re: Question for proof theory specialist: use of inconsistency detectable?**,*george*

**Re: Question for proof theory specialist: use of inconsistency detectable?**,*Jan Burse***Re: Question for proof theory specialist: use of inconsistency detectable?**,*Alan Smaill*

**Re: The members of a set are...?**,*J Jones***Re: The members of a set are...?**,*MoeBlee*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: The members of a set are...?**,*J Jones***Re: The members of a set are...?**,*Jan Burse***Re: The members of a set are...?**,*J Jones***Re: The members of a set are...?**,*Jan Burse*

**Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy**,*Marshall***Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy**,*herbzet***Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy**,*Marshall***Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy**,*Charlie-Boo***OT: SQL**,*Marshall***Re: OT: SQL**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: OT: SQL**,*Marshall***Re: OT: SQL**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: OT: SQL**,*Marshall***Re: OT: SQL**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: OT: SQL**,*Marshall***Re: OT: SQL**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: OT: SQL**,*Marshall***Re: OT: SQL**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: OT: SQL**,*Marshall***Re: OT: SQL**,*Jan Burse***Re: OT: SQL**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: OT: SQL**,*Jan Burse***Re: OT: SQL**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: OT: SQL**,*Jan Burse***Re: OT: SQL**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: OT: SQL**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: OT: SQL**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: OT: SQL**,*Marshall***Re: OT: SQL**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: OT: SQL**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy**,*Marshall***Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy**,*Jan Burse***Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy**,*Jan Burse***Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy**,*Jan Burse***Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy**,*Jan Burse***Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy**,*Jan Burse***Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy**,*Jan Burse***Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy**,*Jan Burse***Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy**,*Jan Burse***Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy**,*Charlie-Boo*

- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy**,*Jan Burse***Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy**,*Jan Burse*

**Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy**,*herbzet***Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy**,*herbzet***Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy**,*herbzet***Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy**,*H. J. Sander Bruggink***Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy**,*H. J. Sander Bruggink***Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy**,*Jesse F. Hughes***Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy**,*Jesse F. Hughes***Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy**,*Jesse F. Hughes***Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy**,*Jesse F. Hughes***Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy**,*Jesse F. Hughes***Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy**,*Jesse F. Hughes***Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy**,*herbzet***Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy**,*Jesse F. Hughes***Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy**,*Jesse F. Hughes***Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy**,*herbzet***Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy**,*herbzet***Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy**,*herbzet*

**Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem**,*Chris Menzel***Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem**,*Chris Menzel***Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem**,*David C . Ullrich***Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem**,*herbzet***Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem**,*Jesse F. Hughes***Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem**,*Jesse F. Hughes***Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem**,*Jesse F. Hughes***Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem**,*David C . Ullrich***Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem**,*herbzet***Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem**,*herbzet***Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem**,*David C . Ullrich***Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem**,*Jesse F. Hughes***Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem**,*Chris Menzel***Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem**,*MoeBlee***Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem**,*herbzet***Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem**,*David C . Ullrich*

- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem**,*Chris Menzel***Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem**,*herbzet***Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem**,*herbzet***Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem**,*herbzet***Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem**,*herbzet***Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem**,*David C . Ullrich***Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem**,*David C . Ullrich***Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem**,*David C . Ullrich***Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem**,*David C . Ullrich***Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem**,*David C . Ullrich***Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem**,*Jesse F. Hughes***Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem**,*William Hale***Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem**,*Chris Menzel***Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem**,*Chris Menzel***Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem**,*Jesse F. Hughes***Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem**,*Jesse F. Hughes***Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem**,*Chris Menzel***Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem**,*Jesse F. Hughes***Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem**,*Chris Menzel***Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem**,*David C . Ullrich*

**Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem**,*David C . Ullrich***Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem**,*David C . Ullrich***Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem**,*David C . Ullrich***Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem**,*Charlie-Boo*

**Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem**,*Aatu Koskensilta*

**Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem**,*Jesse F. Hughes*

**Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem**,*herbzet***Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem**,*herbzet***Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem**,*herbzet***Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem**,*herbzet***Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem**,*Jesse F. Hughes***Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem**,*herbzet***Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem**,*herbzet***Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem**,*Jesse F. Hughes***Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem**,*Jesse F. Hughes*

**Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem**,*herbzet***Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem**,*herbzet***Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem**,*herbzet***Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem**,*herbzet***Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem**,*herbzet***Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem**,*herbzet***Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem**,*herbzet*

**Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem**,*William Hale*