Re: All panduks are green
- From: Newberry <newberryxy@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 3 May 2008 07:36:40 -0700 (PDT)
On May 2, 9:49 pm, "Nam D. Nguyen" <namducngu...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Newberry wrote:
On May 2, 5:40 am, "Nam D. Nguyen" <namducngu...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Jesse F. Hughes wrote:
"Nam D. Nguyen" <namducngu...@xxxxxxx> writes:Because truth can be defined (and should be) by provability!
Daryl McCullough wrote:Funny inference you have there. Daryl says "Truth is not the same as
Let me just say further how much I object to defining truth as provability.Why people in "modern" time, 70+ years after Hilbert's time and
after the time when intuitive paradoxes were abound, look at
provability as if it were a disease really perplexes me.
provability". You conclude that Daryl thinks provability is a
disease.
I would certainly agree but you realize this is very unorthodox view?
So long as one has a good reason to support it, which I think I do,
that shouldn't be a deterrence.
You will not get anywhere with logical reasoning. That is not how the
system works. But I would be curious what your reasons are.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: All panduks are green
- From: Nam D. Nguyen
- Re: All panduks are green
- References:
- Re: All panduks are green
- From: Newberry
- Re: All panduks are green
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: All panduks are green
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: All panduks are green
- From: Nam D. Nguyen
- Re: All panduks are green
- From: Jesse F. Hughes
- Re: All panduks are green
- From: Nam D. Nguyen
- Re: All panduks are green
- From: Newberry
- Re: All panduks are green
- From: Nam D. Nguyen
- Re: All panduks are green
- Prev by Date: Pseudo Negation - A Formal Definition of "As Strong as Arithmetic"
- Next by Date: Re: Pseudo Negation - A Formal Definition of "As Strong as Arithmetic"
- Previous by thread: Re: All panduks are green
- Next by thread: Re: All panduks are green
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|