Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy
- From: Charlie-Boo <shymathguy@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 3 May 2008 14:33:15 -0700 (PDT)
On May 3, 12:26 pm, Marshall <marshall.spi...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On May 3, 8:14 am, Charlie-Boo <shymath...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Apr 30, 6:18 pm, Marshall <marshall.spi...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Some time ago in comp.databases.theory I parodied
a blog post entitled "Is Codd Dead?", Codd being Ted Codd,
the father of modern data management techniques.
Codd noticed that databases contain relations. The rest of what he
said was a totally failed attempt to formalize and automate database
query processing. SQL is an example of that failure, by virtue of it
being only a programming language rather than an automatic query
processor.
(History of data management is probably off-topic, though.)
BTW That comment provides a proof that he failed. Can you (anybody)
see how?
C-B
Marshall.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy
- From: Marshall
- Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy
- References:
- Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy
- From: Marshall
- Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy
- From: Marshall
- Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy
- Prev by Date: Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy
- Next by Date: Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem
- Previous by thread: Re: OT: SQL
- Next by thread: Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading