Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy
- From: Charlie-Boo <shymathguy@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 3 May 2008 19:19:33 -0700 (PDT)
On May 3, 7:01 pm, herbzet <herb...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Charlie-Boo wrote:
Jan Burse wrote:
2. If I take (1) and run it through some sort of software that ends up
saying that it has "verified" that as being a proof, could that per se
constitute a proof of some particular theorem?
Four-color theorem.
HA HA HA
Note that the question is asking if wffs with no natural language and
a program that just says "verified" constitute a proof. The
Mathematicians who are credited with proving that theorem used plenty
of natural language when they described a program that checked for
certain possible map structures.
C-B
--
hz
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy
- From: herbzet
- Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy
- References:
- Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy
- From: herbzet
- Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy
- Prev by Date: Re: OT: SQL
- Next by Date: Re: All panduks are green
- Previous by thread: Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy
- Next by thread: Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|