Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy

From: stevendaryl3016@xxxxxxxxx (Daryl McCullough)
Date: 6 May 2008 15:34:27 -0700

In article <6c575e8a-a453-46b7-bb01-2dc068cfc09f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Charlie-Boo says...

On May 6, 4:13=A0pm, "Jesse F. Hughes" <je...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

See the thread titled "Contradiction or paradox" on Google.

No such one. Another bogus reference.

You need some practice using search engines.
Try this url:

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.logic/browse_frm/thread/787811f6b809bed0/43a06d7f28eea698?hl=en&lnk=st&q=#43a06d7f28eea698

or this tinyURL:

http://tinyurl.com/56tver

--
Daryl McCullough
Ithaca, NY

.

References:
- Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy
  - From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy
  - From: Charlie-Boo

Prev by Date: Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem
Next by Date: Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem
Previous by thread: Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy
Next by thread: Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: help with Godels
... Daryl McCullough wrote: ... problem with an explicit accounting of that knowledge? ... I don't think it matters much in practice. ... practice and no one should worry at all! ...
(sci.logic)
Re: Site Critique please - http://www.freedomnames.co.uk
... It's still my opinion that it's not 'best practice'. ... It's a tricky one that goes hand in hand with accessibility. ... will perform better in the search engines. ... the layout bloat of tables, ...
(uk.net.web.authoring)