Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem
- From: herbzet <herbzet@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 06 May 2008 22:43:59 -0400
Charlie-Boo wrote:
herbzet wrote:
herbzet wrote:
Charlie-Boo wrote:...
Bertrand Russell wrote: ?In any symbolic expression, the letters may
be interpreted as classes or as propositions, and the relation of
inclusion in the one case may be replaced by that of formal
implication in the other.? - Principles of Mathematics
Yes, this appears in
http://fair-use.org/bertrand-russell/the-principles-of-mathematics/s13
to which I gave the link a few days ago in
news:48180F8C.364310BD@xxxxxxxxxx
You're welcome.
Btw, I disagree with Russell's analysis here. Do you agree
with Russell's analysis?
Throw yourself on the sword!!!
Tell me one theorem that doesn't exist in both forms.
Um, modus ponens?
That's not really relevant, anyway. What I /said/ was
that I don't agree with Russell's /analysis/. Do you
agree with Russell's /analysis/?
--
hz
.
- References:
- Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem
- From: herbzet
- Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem
- From: herbzet
- Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem
- Prev by Date: Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem
- Next by Date: Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem
- Previous by thread: Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem
- Next by thread: Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|