Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy
- From: Jan Burse <janburse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 07 May 2008 08:00:34 +0200
Charlie-Boo schrieb:
I assume you never ran the program.Not very convincing.
Bye
Yes, because there is nothing obviously to download and execute.
As you told me yourself.
>>> As you can see, it was published as a conference paper and
>>> **you have to type it in** - it's written in the M
>>> programming language (available free on-line.) It includes
>>> a little subroutine that does a check of
>>> your input based on checksums.
Could you provide me a link, so that I dont have to type in something.
.
- References:
- Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy
- From: Marshall
- Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy
- From: Jan Burse
- Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy
- From: Jan Burse
- Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy
- From: Jan Burse
- Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy
- From: Jan Burse
- Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy
- From: Jan Burse
- Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy
- From: Jan Burse
- Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy
- From: Jan Burse
- Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy
- Prev by Date: Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem
- Next by Date: Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem
- Previous by thread: Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy
- Next by thread: Re: Existence of proof verifiers: A comedy
- Index(es):