Re: primitive recursive: obsolete?
- From: Chris Menzel <cmenzel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 9 May 2008 18:22:54 +0000 (UTC)
On Thu, 8 May 2008 09:46:45 -0700 (PDT), MoeBlee <jazzmobe@xxxxxxxxxxx> said:
On May 7, 4:54 pm, MoeBlee <jazzm...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
the primitive recursive functions all have algorithms that require
only a "do for" loop and don't require a "do while" loop
I meant 'do until' not 'do while' there.
Either would do, no? They differ slightly in behavior, but those
constructs are exactly equivalent in terms of computational strength.
Anything you can program in terms of the one you can program in terms of
the other.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: primitive recursive: obsolete?
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: primitive recursive: obsolete?
- References:
- primitive recursive: obsolete?
- From: Marshall
- Re: primitive recursive: obsolete?
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: primitive recursive: obsolete?
- From: MoeBlee
- primitive recursive: obsolete?
- Prev by Date: Re: All panduks are green
- Next by Date: Re: An Easy, Logical Solution to the Monty Hall Problem
- Previous by thread: Re: primitive recursive: obsolete?
- Next by thread: Re: primitive recursive: obsolete?
- Index(es):