Re: Intuitionistic second order propositional logic: Any sources?
- From: Alan Smaill <smaill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2008 17:17:30 +0100
Jan Burse <janburse@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Dear All
It seems that intuitionistic logic, when equipped
with quantifiers that range over propositional
variables, becomes classical.
Because we can define:
f= forall p p
Etc..
why would that make the logic become classical?
Anybody knows approaches to second order propositional
logic which does not collapse this way?
Dana Scott, I think, showed hoe to define the propositional connectives
in this context from a small number of primitives (the propositional
connectives are mostly not interdefinable in the usual case).
Best Regards
--
Alan Smaill
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Intuitionistic second order propositional logic: Any sources?
- From: Franz Binder
- Re: Intuitionistic second order propositional logic: Any sources?
- References:
- Intuitionistic second order propositional logic: Any sources?
- From: Jan Burse
- Intuitionistic second order propositional logic: Any sources?
- Prev by Date: Intuitionistic second order propositional logic: Any sources?
- Next by Date: Relevant Arithmetic
- Previous by thread: Intuitionistic second order propositional logic: Any sources?
- Next by thread: Re: Intuitionistic second order propositional logic: Any sources?
- Index(es):