Re: Calculus vs. Non-contradiction?
- From: Rupert <rupertmccallum@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 23:46:25 -0700 (PDT)
On Jun 9, 5:32 pm, OccasionalFlyer <klit...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
I have no background in Calculus but I am convinced that the
principle in logic of Non-Contradiction to be correct. A and Not-A
cannot both be true simultaneously. However, I was recently told by
someone, who is reading some very big, philosophical book on
mathematics, that the proposition of calculus disproves the Law of Non-
Contradiction in logic. Can someone fill me in on how this would
work? Thanks.
Calculus does not disprove the law of non-contradiction.
Perhaps you could tell us which book this person is reading. It's not
Berkeley's "Discourse addressed to an infidel mathematician", is it?
That was written before calculus had rigorous foundations.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Calculus vs. Non-contradiction?
- From: OccasionalFlyer
- Re: Calculus vs. Non-contradiction?
- References:
- Calculus vs. Non-contradiction?
- From: OccasionalFlyer
- Calculus vs. Non-contradiction?
- Prev by Date: Re: Confusion about gödels proof for con(ZF+CH)
- Next by Date: Re: Peano arithmetic and simple type theory
- Previous by thread: Calculus vs. Non-contradiction?
- Next by thread: Re: Calculus vs. Non-contradiction?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading