Re: The principle of non-contradiction re-assessed
- From: William Elliot <marsh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 21:52:50 -0700
On Tue, 10 Jun 2008, John Jones wrote:
I want to illuminate in my own way the nature of a law or principle. I will use a popular example to do this - the principle of non-contradiction*:What is the principle of non-contradiction?
Does it have to do with reducio ad absurdum,
ie, proof by contradiction?
Argument cannot ratify the self-evident.
Oh. I'll prove by contradiction that I would ratify JJ.
So assume I won't. ...
.
- References:
- The principle of non-contradiction re-assessed
- From: John Jones
- The principle of non-contradiction re-assessed
- Prev by Date: NP Incomplete?
- Next by Date: practical logic
- Previous by thread: The principle of non-contradiction re-assessed
- Next by thread: Re: The principle of non-contradiction re-assessed
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|