Re: What should I say to the post-grads about Godel?

On Jun 13, 12:04 pm, John Jones <jonescard...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
The Prof has asked me to briefly introduce to the post-grads the
significance of Godel's incompleteness theorem to logic, notions of
determinism and free-will, and to other pertinent issues in philosophy.
This might include a discussion on the significance of proof itself.

What would you say to them on this topic? A few are analytic
philosophers, but most are, I think, continentalists, though this
shouldn't matter as Godel seems to be branching everywhere. These guys
aren't stupid though ..

You should stress that Goedel's incompleteness theorem has nothing to
do with determinism and free will.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: What should I say to the post-grads about Godel?
    ... determinism and free-will, and to other pertinent issues in philosophy. ... You should stress that Goedel's incompleteness theorem has nothing to ... Perhaps the reason for this is the consumerist, production-orientated american way. ...
    (sci.logic)
  • Re: What should I say to the post-grads about Godel?
    ... determinism and free-will, and to other pertinent issues in philosophy. ... You should stress that Goedel's incompleteness theorem has nothing to ... But you can settle this by giving a reference. ...
    (sci.logic)
  • Re: What should I say to the post-grads about Godel?
    ... determinism and free-will, and to other pertinent issues in philosophy. ... You should stress that Goedel's incompleteness theorem has nothing to ... Godel thought it did. ...
    (sci.logic)
  • Re: What should I say to the post-grads about Godel?
    ... determinism and free-will, and to other pertinent issues in philosophy. ... You should stress that Goedel's incompleteness theorem has nothing to ... Godel thought it did. ...
    (sci.logic)
  • Re: What should I say to the post-grads about Godel?
    ... philosophy. ... deranged recommendation) to discuss Godel's incompleteness theorem at ... Determinism is false ... Gödel's theorem is actually unknowable because it involves self-reference ...
    (sci.logic)