Re: completeness what is it exactly
- From: Aatu Koskensilta <aatu.koskensilta@xxxxxx>
- Date: 09 Jul 2008 21:53:52 +0300
Chris Menzel <cmenzel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
On 09 Jul 2008 19:46:33 +0300, Aatu Koskensilta
<aatu.koskensilta@xxxxxx> said:
The more usual definition is that a logic is weakly complete if there
is a deductive system in which all of its validities are provable and
strongly complete if there is a deductive system such that if A is a
logical consequence of B then B is derivable from A.
A from B, of course.
That is an even more usual definition, yes.
--
Aatu Koskensilta (aatu.koskensilta@xxxxxx)
"Wovon man nicht sprechen kann, darüber muss man schweigen"
- Ludwig Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: completeness what is it exactly
- From: translogi
- Re: completeness what is it exactly
- References:
- completeness what is it exactly
- From: translogi
- Re: completeness what is it exactly
- From: Rupert
- Re: completeness what is it exactly
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: completeness what is it exactly
- From: Chris Menzel
- completeness what is it exactly
- Prev by Date: Re: completeness what is it exactly
- Next by Date: Re: Mathematics - the good old days!
- Previous by thread: Re: completeness what is it exactly
- Next by thread: Re: completeness what is it exactly
- Index(es):