Re: My talk about Godel to the post-grads.
- From: John Jones <jonescardiff@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 22:16:30 +0100
MoeBlee wrote:
On Jul 9, 2:04 pm, John Jones <jonescard...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
IF a union of A and B is described only in terms of either A or B, then
how can a union be a union of A AND B?
ie. how can you have a union of EITHER A OR B?
Here's the definition:
AuB = U{A B}
and that is equivalent to
AuB = y <-> As(sey <-> (seA v seB))
and that is equivalent to
AuB = {s | seA v seB}
So let's focus on that equation:
AuB = {s | seA v seB}
I.e., the union of A with B is the set whose members are all and only
those s that are either in A or in B. (Where 'or' is the inclusive
sense of 'or', i.e., "either in A or in B or in both A and B").
The definition mentions BOTH A and B (in both the definiens and
definendum), but the CONDITION for membership in the UNION is simply
that of being in either A or in B (or in both).
Does that clear it up for you?
MoeBlee
[C comes into it because if the union is only of either A or B, then C
can be associated with either term. Honestly, your definition must be
wrongly transcribed.]
It clarifies the problem, for which I am still looking for a solution.
A and B have nothing in common in the scenario you potray. Only one is actually in the union. The other has nothing to do with it. If A is in the union, then B is no more pertinent than C, or X. Y. Z..
.
- References:
- Re: My talk about Godel to the post-grads.
- From: John Jones
- Re: My talk about Godel to the post-grads.
- From: Chris Menzel
- Re: My talk about Godel to the post-grads.
- From: John Jones
- Re: My talk about Godel to the post-grads.
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: My talk about Godel to the post-grads.
- From: John Jones
- Re: My talk about Godel to the post-grads.
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: My talk about Godel to the post-grads.
- From: John Jones
- Re: My talk about Godel to the post-grads.
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: My talk about Godel to the post-grads.
- From: John Jones
- Re: My talk about Godel to the post-grads.
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: My talk about Godel to the post-grads.
- From: John Jones
- Re: My talk about Godel to the post-grads.
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: My talk about Godel to the post-grads.
- From: John Jones
- Re: My talk about Godel to the post-grads.
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: My talk about Godel to the post-grads.
- From: John Jones
- Re: My talk about Godel to the post-grads.
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: My talk about Godel to the post-grads.
- Prev by Date: Re: My talk about Godel to the post-grads.
- Next by Date: Re: My talk about Godel to the post-grads.
- Previous by thread: Re: My talk about Godel to the post-grads.
- Next by thread: Re: My talk about Godel to the post-grads.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|