Re: completeness what is it exactly
- From: MoeBlee <jazzmobe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 11:31:40 -0700 (PDT)
On Jul 15, 10:25 am, translogi <wilem...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The problems start when it is not given that P is an sentence.
I don't know what context in which it is not given that something is
or is not a sentence that you see a problem.
Would it then mean that
P-> P isn't a sentence either?
If P is not a sentence, the P->P is not a sentence.
That is ensured by the recursive definition of 'occurs free in'.
I don't see whatever difficulty you think there is.
MoeBlee
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: completeness what is it exactly
- From: translogi
- Re: completeness what is it exactly
- References:
- completeness what is it exactly
- From: translogi
- Re: completeness what is it exactly
- From: Rupert
- Re: completeness what is it exactly
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: completeness what is it exactly
- From: Chris Menzel
- Re: completeness what is it exactly
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: completeness what is it exactly
- From: translogi
- Re: completeness what is it exactly
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: completeness what is it exactly
- From: translogi
- Re: completeness what is it exactly
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: completeness what is it exactly
- From: translogi
- completeness what is it exactly
- Prev by Date: Re: My talk about Godel to the post-grads.
- Next by Date: Re: My talk about Godel to the post-grads.
- Previous by thread: Re: completeness what is it exactly
- Next by thread: Re: completeness what is it exactly
- Index(es):