Re: My talk about Godel to the post-grads.



On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 13:18:10 +0100, John Jones <jonescardiff@xxxxxxx>
wrote:

I just think you are stupid Ulrich.

I think you are stupid because you think (if you have thought about it
at all) that a term can play a role (in a union) even though it plays no
role. Let's simplify that:

You think that letters are signs.

You won't be able to understand that, I know. So I will give you an
example. Remember the definition of a union? Well, consider the case
that x is only in A.

This makes no sense. Do you mean that x is an element of A and
B is empty, or that x is an element of A and B can contain things
other than x or what?

In the definition, "the set of x such that..." means
"the set of _all_ x such that...". You keep referring
to "x" as though we'd specified what that symbol means.

You then claim AuB.

I don't "claim AuB". It doesn't make any sense to "claim"
a set. I certainly do claim that there is such a thing as
AuB.

Now then, "B" (in AuB) is not a
sign Ulrich. It is a redundant sign. It is a letter. It plays no role in
the game. So you can leave it out. Geddit mutton-head? dolt?

Supposing for the sake of argument that all of that were true,
not that it actually is: B plays no role, B is redundant, you
can leave it out. Fine. That has no effect whatever on the
validity of the definition.

Hint: Think about letters and signs (for example, numerals and numbers)

A number is _not_ a "sign", speaking of confusion.

and the ways in which they can be confused.

David C. Ullrich

"Understanding Godel isn't about following his formal proof.
That would make a mockery of everything Godel was up to."
(John Jones, "My talk about Godel to the post-grads."
in sci.logic.)
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: NBC Blows [Russert]
    ... preserved the Union, and FDR commanded the Allies. ... note that the plays of Solidarity and the Roman Catholic Church ... also key (bringing the IJN down to one deck in the first attack versus ...
    (rec.sport.football.college)
  • Re: Naught gnubg
    ... why gnubg didn't do an automatic redouble. ... checking that there aren't market losers. ... "Understanding Godel isn't about following his formal proof. ... it's going to sit around looking for other optimal plays once ...
    (rec.games.backgammon)
  • Re: Naught gnubg
    ... plays once it's found an optimal one. ... what you say is meaningless bullshit. ... It's nonsense to say that's nonsense. ... "Understanding Godel isn't about following his formal proof. ...
    (rec.games.backgammon)