Re: completeness what is it exactly



Ahh

At least two different kinds of completeness.

In this post I stick to (modal) propositional logic

A (Uppercase) is a well formed formula
p (lowercase) is a propositional variable




1 the opposite of soundness

|= A -> |-A

if (using a truthtable, or other mechanical means) a formula is always
true then that formula is provable .

also
if a formula A is unsatisfiable (never true) then |- ~A

(or is this a step to far)


2 negation completeness

All well formed formula's are (provable) true or false.

for every A |-A or |- ~A

this is more complicated.

for this
all propositional variables need to have a fixed truth value
(otherwise neither |-p or |- ~p can be deduced)


am i forgetting something?

On Jul 16, 10:35 pm, MoeBlee <jazzm...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

That is a DIFFERENT sense of completeness. We're not talking about
that sense of completeness. Also, it does not make sense to talk about
a formula being true if it is not known that the formula is a
sentence. Open formulas are not true or false in a model; rather open
formulas are satifisfied or not satisified in a model with an
assignment to the variables.


My question was about completeness in any sense.


.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: completeness what is it exactly
    ... At least two different kinds of completeness. ... For every well formed formula, eihter it or its negation is provable. ... all propositional variables need to have a fixed truth value ...
    (sci.logic)
  • Re: completeness what is it exactly
    ... There are at least two different types of completeness. ... but the word 'negation completeness' does not belong there. ... not already a member of the theory results in an inconsistent theory. ... {for this all propositional variables need to have a fixed truth ...
    (sci.logic)
  • Re: completeness what is it exactly
    ... There are at least two different types of completeness. ... {this is just one form of negation completeness there are others.} ... {from Jan Burse} ... {for this all propositional variables need to have a fixed truth ...
    (sci.logic)