Re: Computable functions/reals.
- From: David C. Ullrich <dullrich@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 06:32:43 -0500
On Sun, 17 Aug 2008 21:34:41 -0700 (PDT), reasterly@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Aug 16, 6:08 am, David C. Ullrich <dullr...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 21:28:46 -0700 (PDT), reaste...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
My proof shows even machines like Zeno machines,
which we assume can perform an infinite number
of operations in finite time, can't write an infinitely
long string and halt (or be halted).
Ah. "And halt". Fine. This machine that computes
a computable function from R to R doesn't halt.
How do you know what is on the output tape
if the TM doesn't halt?
You don't ever see _all_ of the output. Which
makes perfect sense - that's the way real numbers
are. Given an N and an x there exists M such that
after the machine has read the first M digits of x
it has output the first N digits of f(x).
You are implicitly assuming the machine halts
when you assume the output tape exists
and has a representation of 2x on it.
I think you are arguing the following:
You can think what you want about what I'm
arguing. In _fact_ I haven't said anything
about infinitely fast machines.
Assuming we have a TM that can perform
an infinite number of operations in finite time,
and assuming this TM can read and write
infinite tapes in finite time, then f(x) = 2x
is a computable function where x is real.
If this is what you think then you are wrong.
Even assuming there exists an infinitely fast TM,
I can prove the output on the tape is always finite.
If your claim is true then 2*PI is a rational number.
Russell
- 2 many 2 count
David C. Ullrich
"Understanding Godel isn't about following his formal proof.
That would make a mockery of everything Godel was up to."
(John Jones, "My talk about Godel to the post-grads."
in sci.logic.)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Computable functions/reals.
- From: reasterly
- Re: Computable functions/reals.
- References:
- Re: Computable functions/reals.
- From: David C. Ullrich
- Re: Computable functions/reals.
- From: Gc
- Re: Computable functions/reals.
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: Computable functions/reals.
- From: reasterly
- Re: Computable functions/reals.
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: Computable functions/reals.
- From: reasterly
- Re: Computable functions/reals.
- Prev by Date: Re: Computable functions/reals.
- Next by Date: Re: Computable functions/reals.
- Previous by thread: Re: Computable functions/reals.
- Next by thread: Re: Computable functions/reals.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|