Re: Looking for Undecidable Propositions in Systems without a certain amount of arthimetic.
- From: Balthasar <nomail@invalid>
- Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 23:54:44 +0200
Am Fri, 15 Aug 2008 13:15:02 -0700 (PDT) schrieb Scott:
This is not a wff in any standard system of FOPL. There we usually don't
S -> Ex(x ^ ~x))
(and can't) "negate" terms (or variables). Moreover to connect _object
variables_ with "sentential connectives" is not possible there (i.e. does
not occur in a wff). Actually, it doesn't make any sense at meta-level.
See:
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/First-OrderLogic.html
B.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Looking for Undecidable Propositions in Systems without a certain amount of arthimetic.
- From: Scott
- Re: Looking for Undecidable Propositions in Systems without a certain amount of arthimetic.
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: Looking for Undecidable Propositions in Systems without a certain amount of arthimetic.
- From: Scott
- Re: Looking for Undecidable Propositions in Systems without a certain amount of arthimetic.
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: Looking for Undecidable Propositions in Systems without a certain amount of arthimetic.
- From: Scott
- Re: Looking for Undecidable Propositions in Systems without a certain amount of arthimetic.
- From: Chris Menzel
- Re: Looking for Undecidable Propositions in Systems without a certain amount of arthimetic.
- From: Scott
- Looking for Undecidable Propositions in Systems without a certain amount of arthimetic.
- Prev by Date: Re: Problem with addition
- Next by Date: Re: Looking for Undecidable Propositions in Systems without a certainamountofarthimetic.
- Previous by thread: Re: Looking for Undecidable Propositions in Systems without a certain amount of arthimetic.
- Next by thread: Re: Looking for Undecidable Propositions in Systems without a certain amount of arthimetic.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|