Re: Meyer's Argument against Gödel's Theorem
- From: herbzet <herbzet@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 14:23:06 -0400
MoeBlee wrote:
jeffreykeg...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Gödel noticed that arithmetic cannot prove its own consistency.
This (the fact that there is something arithmetic cannot prove) is
a meta-proof that arithmetic is consistent.
No, we have: IF PA (or whatever system rich enough for a certain
amount of arithmetic) is consistent THEN PA does not prove its own
consistency.
This is indeed the content of Godel's second incompleteness theorem,
as I said in another post. But isn't some business at the end of his
paper where he writes something like "Thus, the formula is decided by meta-mathematical
means"?
That in itself is not a proof of the consistency of PA,
since in itself it does not reveal that there is a formula that PA
does not prove but only that IF PA is consistent THEN there is a
formula that PA does not prove, which is known already anyway. So a
proof of the consistency of PA must come from some other means.
--
hz
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Meyer's Argument against Gödel's Theorem
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Meyer's Argument against Gödel's Theorem
- References:
- Meyer's Argument against Gödel's Theorem
- From: LauLuna
- Re: Meyer's Argument against Gödel's Theorem
- From: Peter_Smith
- Re: Meyer's Argument against Gödel's Theorem
- From: LauLuna
- Re: Meyer's Argument against Gödel's Theorem
- From: jeffreykegler
- Re: Meyer's Argument against Gödel's Theorem
- From: MoeBlee
- Meyer's Argument against Gödel's Theorem
- Prev by Date: Re: Looking for Undecidable Propositions in Systems without a certainamountofarthimetic.
- Next by Date: Inevitable: Destruction of Logic
- Previous by thread: Re: Meyer's Argument against Gödel's Theorem
- Next by thread: Re: Meyer's Argument against Gödel's Theorem
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|