Re: Computable functions/reals.



On Aug 23, 4:30 am, David C. Ullrich <dullr...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


If you assume the input is always a natural
number then the natural numbers are computable.
All you need is a TM that always returns "True".
You don't even need to read the input.

That's correct. And hence, by definition,
the natural numbers are a recursive set.

We assume the natural numbers are
computable by defining the input to always
be a natural number.

So, we decide if a string is a natural number
when we put the representation on the
input tape. The computer justs trusts
our judgement.


But here you're still just spouting nonsense.
Any string read by an actual computer in
finite time is finite. We're not talking about
that - when we talk about Zeno machines
we're _assuming_ it can do infinitely many
things in finite time.

Even if we assume a computer can perform
an infinite number of operations, it can not
read an infinite tape one character at a time.

I have given a proof of this and no one has
pointed out any error in my proof.

If even an infinitely fast computer can't read
certain "finite" tapes then there exists
natural numbers too large to be read by
any sequential computer and the
natural numbers are not computable
(or even recursively enumerable).


Russell
- 2 many 2 count
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Computable functions/reals.
    ... finite time is finite. ... read an infinite tape one character at a time. ... "Understanding Godel isn't about following his formal proof. ...
    (sci.logic)
  • Re: Cardinality of Set of Computable Numbers?
    ... the INITIAL input tape WAS ... it follows that x is an infinitely long string. ... Saying x has an infinite number of 1's is overkill. ...
    (comp.theory)
  • Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
    ... Such a TM will have a finite input tape and a finite output tape. ... each natural number by a string of 1's followed by a blank. ... using what is essentially an infinite translation table. ... It is true that we can compute any digit of PI. ...
    (sci.logic)
  • Re: TM Tape is Always Finite
    ... >> piece of tape, but it may be the case that as the number of steps grows, ... > an infinitely long string of 1's. ... Unless the machine takes each step in a fraction the time of the ... time, and so "finish" their infinite sequences, then yes, they produce ...
    (comp.theory)
  • Re: No Set Contains Every Computable Natural
    ... Given a string, x, there exists ... > You can't input an infinite string to the tape. ... There is only a finite number of naturals ...
    (comp.theory)