Re: Logic must "look after itself"
- From: "Tron" <tronfuru@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2008 01:01:39 +0200
Hi,
"translogi" <wilemien@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> skrev i melding
news:0e90f163-313c-4c80-b7d1-ac853fe34068@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
.....
He like Russell was very into what we now call classical logic,
(inclusdes the law of the excluded middle )
Classical logic at that time was still very new.
Merely 2500 years...?
Wittgenstein was also very in to truthtables and thought that every
logical statement can be SHOWN to be true by a truthtable
And the table for the above is:
F
What do you think is logic?
Logic is the science of relations between concepts.
T
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Logic must "look after itself"
- From: translogi
- Re: Logic must "look after itself"
- References:
- Re: Logic must "look after itself"
- From: translogi
- Re: Logic must "look after itself"
- From: translogi
- Re: Logic must "look after itself"
- Prev by Date: Re: how to prove E!x(Fx & Gx) -> Ax(Fx-> Gx)
- Next by Date: Re: An argument against modus ponens
- Previous by thread: Re: Logic must "look after itself"
- Next by thread: Re: Logic must "look after itself"
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|