Re: An argument against modus ponens
- From: "|-|erc" <h@xxx>
- Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2008 03:50:25 GMT
"John Jones" <jonescardiff@xxxxxxx> wrote in
Modus Ponens:
If P, then Q.
P. Therefore, Q.
OK lets use an example.
IF a man is a dwarf THEN that man is short
David is a dwarf THEREFORE David is short
Sounds OK
P and R, then Q
P. Therefore, Q
Using the dwarf example above, what would be R?
Herc
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: An argument against modus ponens
- From: John Jones
- Re: An argument against modus ponens
- References:
- An argument against modus ponens
- From: John Jones
- An argument against modus ponens
- Prev by Date: Re: An argument against modus ponens
- Next by Date: Computable functions/reasls: followup.
- Previous by thread: Re: Boolean variables are necessarily boolean
- Next by thread: Re: An argument against modus ponens
- Index(es):
Loading