Re: Applying Godel
- From: slartibartfast <tomokane2003@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2008 09:45:13 -0700 (PDT)
I'm not quite sure what you mean by "apply" here. But given a
specification of a theory T of the right kind, the usual proofs of
Gödel's theorems in effect give instructions for producing Gödel
sentences that are undecided by T but true
ok..but when you follow those instructions ...what does a Godel
sentence actually look like...can you give me a specific example of 1
Godel sentence for 1 particular theory T, (say PA.)
and if that theory were to include G as a new axiom, to give T', how
does G' for T' differ from G for T.
could you write these two G's down side by side so I can get a look at
them.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Applying Godel
- From: |-|erc
- Re: Applying Godel
- From: george
- Re: Applying Godel
- Prev by Date: Re: An argument against modus ponens
- Next by Date: Help Clarify Godel sentence
- Previous by thread: Re: Godel cant tell us what makes a mathematical statement true
- Next by thread: Re: Applying Godel
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|