Re: An argument against modus ponens
- From: george <greeneg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2008 23:06:27 -0700 (PDT)
On Sep 10, 2:35 pm, John Jones <jonescard...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
This is why I said that logic reduces instances to a general case. P is
any object in any framework.
No, it isn't. P is a propostional variable in 0th-order logic.
Not because there is anything special about P that makes it want to be
that,
but BECAUSE *I SAID SO*.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: An argument against modus ponens
- From: John Jones
- Re: An argument against modus ponens
- References:
- An argument against modus ponens
- From: John Jones
- Re: An argument against modus ponens
- From: John Jones
- Re: An argument against modus ponens
- From: OP
- Re: An argument against modus ponens
- From: John Jones
- Re: An argument against modus ponens
- From: OP
- Re: An argument against modus ponens
- From: John Jones
- Re: An argument against modus ponens
- From: OP
- Re: An argument against modus ponens
- From: John Jones
- Re: An argument against modus ponens
- From: OP
- Re: An argument against modus ponens
- From: John Jones
- An argument against modus ponens
- Prev by Date: Re: Godel cant tell us what makes a mathematical statement true
- Next by Date: Re: An argument against modus ponens
- Previous by thread: Re: An argument against modus ponens
- Next by thread: Re: An argument against modus ponens
- Index(es):