Re: An argument against modus ponens
- From: george <greeneg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2008 23:08:50 -0700 (PDT)
On Sep 10, 2:40 pm, John Jones <jonescard...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Objects don't have properties of truth and falsehood.
They do IN LOGIC, DUMBASS.
The whole enterprise IS ABOUT truth and falsehood.
Of course, in first-order logic, we do generally distinguish between
"first-class" objects AND SENTENCES, and it is the latter that
must have truth or falsehood, while the former usually don't.
But in the extended sense in which YOU are using "object"
(you are calling P an object, whereas people WITH a brain would
call P a proposition -- that' s *why* "P" is chosen as a name for it),
propositions and/or boolean variables MUST have truth-values.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: An argument against modus ponens
- From: John Jones
- Re: An argument against modus ponens
- References:
- An argument against modus ponens
- From: John Jones
- Re: An argument against modus ponens
- From: John Jones
- Re: An argument against modus ponens
- From: OP
- Re: An argument against modus ponens
- From: John Jones
- Re: An argument against modus ponens
- From: OP
- Re: An argument against modus ponens
- From: John Jones
- Re: An argument against modus ponens
- From: OP
- Re: An argument against modus ponens
- From: John Jones
- Re: An argument against modus ponens
- From: george
- Re: An argument against modus ponens
- From: John Jones
- An argument against modus ponens
- Prev by Date: Re: An argument against modus ponens
- Next by Date: Re: Help Clarify Godel sentence
- Previous by thread: Re: An argument against modus ponens
- Next by thread: Re: An argument against modus ponens
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|