Re: An argument against modus ponens

On Sep 10, 2:40 pm, John Jones <jonescard...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Objects don't have properties of truth and falsehood.

They do IN LOGIC, DUMBASS.

No they don't. Objects don't have properties of truth and falsehood.
Truth and falsehood are functions not of objects but on the frameworks
within which objects are presented.

I said *IN LOGIC*, DUMBASS.
THAT IMPLIES that THESE objects ARE being presented IN A FRAMEWORK
OF LOGIC, THAT DOES impute truth and falsity TO THEM, TO THE OBJECTS.
Obviously, if we were in a different framework, then we would be
dealing with
DIFFERENT objects.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Commentary: Designs on Us
    ... the only intellectual framework in which people ... >> truth undermines our sense of personal prestige, ... Biochemistry tells us that our bodies are made up of naturally ... Intelligent design and creationism are about things much less ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Commentary: Designs on Us
    ... the only intellectual framework in which people ... >>truth undermines our sense of personal prestige, ... supposed to undermine our our sense of personal prestige? ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Commentary: Designs on Us
    ... the only intellectual framework in which people ... > truth undermines our sense of personal prestige, ... > religious framework, in which people aren't animals at all but rather ... > beings created in the image of God. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Are Muslims the Only Ones?
    ... not that injustice is perpetuated. ... of the motivating factors that does provoke war. ... I think that a willingness to seek the truth in all matters a great ... from the correct framework wrong to a lesser or greater extent. ...
    (soc.religion.quaker)
  • Re: Commentary: Designs on Us
    ... the only intellectual framework in which people ... >> truth undermines our sense of personal prestige, ... >> religious framework, in which people aren't animals at all but rather ... >> beings created in the image of God. ...
    (talk.origins)