Re: Binary Tree and Pairs of Nodes
- From: LudovicoVan <julio@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 05:29:37 -0700 (PDT)
On 15 Oct, 04:37, Virgil <Vir...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article
<77af0440-016d-472c-b03d-5b2f7882b...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
LudovicoVan <ju...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 15 Oct, 01:11, Virgil <Vir...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article
<f74b562c-3c27-4e00-86dc-fe82dbd1b...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
LudovicoVan <ju...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 14 Oct, 19:53, Virgil <Vir...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article
<b0c1118e-a386-4caf-8136-5cd80e769...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
WM <mueck...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I am surprised that it is so hard for you to understand this simple
game.
I can understand the game well enough, but do not see that it leads to
the result you claim.
I require proof that in the process *every* path gets a node assigned to
it, which proof has not been forthcoming.
Let us label each node by its position in the sequence of nodes being
assigned to a path, i.e., each is tagged with a natural, and we will
label each paths by infinite binary sequences of its left versus right
branches with 0 for left branch and 1 for right.
Then we have an injection from N to the set of all infinite binary
strings, which is well known to have an anti-diagonal infinite binary
string which is not a member of the set of infinite binary strings
listed.
Thus your game fails of its purpose.
Wrong conclusion: it's rather your dogma that fails.
It is julio who is being dogmatic, by claiming to be correct without any
proof of correctness.
From a wrong conclusion to a non sequitur: surely not a surprise, you
just being the number one moron and liar around here.
Never number one while you continue posting, julio.
I forgot: idiot.
-LV
.
- References:
- Binary Tree and Pairs of Nodes
- From: WM
- Re: Binary Tree and Pairs of Nodes
- From: Virgil
- Re: Binary Tree and Pairs of Nodes
- From: WM
- Re: Binary Tree and Pairs of Nodes
- From: Virgil
- Re: Binary Tree and Pairs of Nodes
- From: WM
- Re: Binary Tree and Pairs of Nodes
- From: Virgil
- Re: Binary Tree and Pairs of Nodes
- From: WM
- Re: Binary Tree and Pairs of Nodes
- From: Virgil
- Re: Binary Tree and Pairs of Nodes
- From: WM
- Re: Binary Tree and Pairs of Nodes
- From: Virgil
- Re: Binary Tree and Pairs of Nodes
- From: LudovicoVan
- Re: Binary Tree and Pairs of Nodes
- From: Virgil
- Re: Binary Tree and Pairs of Nodes
- From: LudovicoVan
- Re: Binary Tree and Pairs of Nodes
- From: Virgil
- Binary Tree and Pairs of Nodes
- Prev by Date: Re: Choice sequences, intuition, etc
- Next by Date: Re: Binary Tree and Pairs of Nodes
- Previous by thread: Re: Binary Tree and Pairs of Nodes
- Next by thread: Re: Binary Tree and Pairs of Nodes
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|