Re: Formulating sentences in a possibly consistent ZF

MoeBlee wrote:
On Nov 5, 2:05 pm, John Jones <jonescard...@xxxxxxx> wrote:

You gave two models of ZF:
1) ZF is a totality of sentences.
2) ZF is not a totality of sentences.

No, I didn't say anything here aboot MODELS of ZF, nor did I refer to
"a totality of sentences". Please don't be a jerk.

MoeBlee

'We can formulate sentences "in" ZF' is ambiguous.
A sentence that is 'in ZF' can mean either 'included with other ZF sentences', or it can mean 'included with sentences that together obtain or show ZF'.
.