Re: Specifying Sets
- From: John Jones <jonescardiff@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 20:39:37 +0000
Chris Menzel wrote:
an empirically verifiable fact
about the usage of the term in mathematical contexts.
So, according to maths naming convention, a 'shopping list' is a set and not a list. BTW, if this convention flies in the face of common usage don't make sour faces by privileging one use over the other.
So, an unordered collection is not called a list but is called a set. An ordered collection is called a list. Why?
Which different words am I using? The set of all x reduces to all x.
So how would you reduce "The set of all solar planets has nine members"
to a statment about "all solar planets"?
There are 9 solar planets. If we insist on employing the term 'members' then "The set of all solar planets has nine members" reduces to 'set of nine objects', which reduces further to '9'.
'all x' is coherent. 'The set of all x' is not.
There is nothing extravagant is saying "the set of all blondes", aboveBut as you yourself indicate, there's no difference apart from
all if you are doing mathematics.
convention in saying 'the set of all x' and 'all x'. The former, is therefore extravagent.
The point you seem to be missing is that sets are mathematical objects.
A 'mathematical set' is the sign surrounding glyph {}. There's never been anything else presented beyond that, object-wise.
Reference to them therefore requires locutions like the former. "all x"
does not pick out a set, it simply quantifies over the x's and hence
will not do the job.
If 'all' blondes picks out all blondes, what does the 'set' of all blondes pick out? If you can answer that it will be a surprise, for everything I've seen so far indicates that the term set is used indiscriminately.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Specifying Sets
- From: Mitch Harris
- Re: Specifying Sets
- From: Chris Menzel
- Re: Specifying Sets
- References:
- Specifying Sets
- From: John Jones
- Re: Specifying Sets
- From: LudovicoVan
- Re: Specifying Sets
- From: John Jones
- Re: Specifying Sets
- From: LudovicoVan
- Re: Specifying Sets
- From: John Jones
- Re: Specifying Sets
- From: Chris Menzel
- Specifying Sets
- Prev by Date: Re: Formulating sentences in a possibly consistent ZF
- Next by Date: Re: Specifying Sets
- Previous by thread: Re: Specifying Sets
- Next by thread: Re: Specifying Sets
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|