Re: Cantor's "diagonal argument". My Objection.
- From: magidin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Arturo Magidin)
- Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 02:51:26 +0000 (UTC)
In article <gh9mat$l8h$2@xxxxxxxx>, John Jones <jonescardiff@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Arturo Magidin wrote:
No, I did not. I said "an ordering among the naturals".
Yes, a placement for digits.
You know, just repeating the same lie (or the same idiocy) does not
suddenly make it true. Your crap does not become gold simply because
you insist on trying to polish it.
--
======================================================================
"It's not denial. I'm just very selective about
what I accept as reality."
--- Calvin ("Calvin and Hobbes" by Bill Watterson)
======================================================================
Arturo Magidin
magidin-at-member-ams-org
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Cantor's "diagonal argument". My Objection.
- From: John Jones
- Re: Cantor's "diagonal argument". My Objection.
- References:
- Cantor's "diagonal argument". My Objection.
- From: John Jones
- Re: Cantor's "diagonal argument". My Objection.
- From: John Jones
- Cantor's "diagonal argument". My Objection.
- Prev by Date: Re: Cantor's "diagonal argument". My Objection.
- Next by Date: Re: Cantor's "diagonal argument". My Objection.
- Previous by thread: Re: Cantor's "diagonal argument". My Objection.
- Next by thread: Re: Cantor's "diagonal argument". My Objection.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
