Re: A summary of my position so far.
- From: David C. Ullrich <dullrich@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 06:45:37 -0600
On Thu, 18 Dec 2008 00:08:24 +0000, John Jones <jonescardiff@xxxxxxx>
wrote:
I have indicated in previous posts that sequence or calculus or whether
these regarding the former substantive would seem to find themselves
and their applications must manifest the number 2 application of an
included in the list proportioned as a set, odd/even,
etc. In the creation of a set no new like the numbers in another set without also.
Excellent summary, thanks.
David C. Ullrich
"Understanding Godel isn't about following his formal proof.
That would make a mockery of everything Godel was up to."
(John Jones, "My talk about Godel to the post-grads."
in sci.logic.)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: A summary of my position so far.
- From: John Jones
- Re: A summary of my position so far.
- From: Mitch Harris
- Re: A summary of my position so far.
- References:
- A summary of my position so far.
- From: John Jones
- A summary of my position so far.
- Prev by Date: Re: The Big Bang as grammatical faux pas
- Next by Date: Re: A summary of my position so far.
- Previous by thread: Re: A summary of my position so far.
- Next by thread: Re: A summary of my position so far.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|