Re: A summary of my position so far.

On Dec 18, 7:45 am, David C. Ullrich <dullr...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, 18 Dec 2008 00:08:24 +0000, John Jones <jonescard...@xxxxxxx>
wrote:

I have indicated in previous posts that sequence or calculus or whether
these regarding the former substantive would seem to find themselves
and their applications must manifest the number 2 application of an  
included in the list proportioned as a set, odd/even,
etc. In the creation of a set no new like the numbers in another set without also.

Excellent summary, thanks.

That almost worked. How did you -do- that?

Mitch
.