Re: Extrapolating linear ratios
- From: Herbert Newman <nomail@invalid>
- Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 01:04:16 +0100
On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 15:50:41 -0800 (PST) george wrote:
How right you are!
remember, no good deed goes unpunished!
It doesn't claim that. It claims: "Everything is a set."
ZFC, ... claiming that its sets can be about "everything", ...
And that's true. Meaning: Everything in its universe is a set!
Proof:
Define: set x :<-> x = x.
Then
Ax(set x)
"Everything is a set."
qed.
So what? Since it's universe is not a member of its universe, it NEED NOT
...there is no universal set.
be a set. Still everything there is (in the universe of ZFC, that is) is a
set.
Herb
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Extrapolating linear ratios
- From: george
- Re: Extrapolating linear ratios
- From: Herbert Newman
- Re: Extrapolating linear ratios
- References:
- Extrapolating linear ratios
- From: WM
- Re: Extrapolating linear ratios
- From: WM
- Re: Extrapolating linear ratios
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: Extrapolating linear ratios
- From: WM
- Re: Extrapolating linear ratios
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: Extrapolating linear ratios
- From: WM
- Re: Extrapolating linear ratios
- From: george
- Re: Extrapolating linear ratios
- From: WM
- Re: Extrapolating linear ratios
- From: george
- Re: Extrapolating linear ratios
- From: Herbert Newman
- Re: Extrapolating linear ratios
- From: george
- Extrapolating linear ratios
- Prev by Date: Re: Extrapolating linear ratios
- Next by Date: Re: Extrapolating linear ratios
- Previous by thread: Re: Extrapolating linear ratios
- Next by thread: Re: Extrapolating linear ratios
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|