Re: A summary of my position so far.
- From: David C. Ullrich <dullrich@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 03:10:46 -0600
On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 06:01:42 -0800 (PST), Mitch Harris
<maharri@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Dec 19, 6:41 am, David C. Ullrich <dullr...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, 18 Dec 2008 06:51:34 -0800 (PST), Mitch Harris
<maha...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Dec 18, 7:45 am, David C. Ullrich <dullr...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, 18 Dec 2008 00:08:24 +0000, John Jones <jonescard...@xxxxxxx>
wrote:
I have indicated in previous posts that sequence or calculus or whether
these regarding the former substantive would seem to find themselves
and their applications must manifest the number 2 application of an
included in the list proportioned as a set, odd/even,
etc. In the creation of a set no new like the numbers in another set without also.
Excellent summary, thanks.
That almost worked. How did you -do- that?
??? I just quoted what he wrote. Of course I snipped a few irrelevant
words here and there...
I thought it might have been an automatic text scrambler that somehow
preserves grammar (or lack thereof) or something like dissociated-
press.
Selective snipping is rather manipulative.
You unaware of the historical precedent - JJ has this habit of taking
a moderately complex argument and snipping all but the last
sentence, thereby hiding the entire point.
I think verbatim quotes are enough to show what you want to show; your
last sentence stood out in its uncharacteristic unparsability.
Mitch
David C. Ullrich
"Understanding Godel isn't about following his formal proof.
That would make a mockery of everything Godel was up to."
(John Jones, "My talk about Godel to the post-grads."
in sci.logic.)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: A summary of my position so far.
- From: Mitch Harris
- Re: A summary of my position so far.
- References:
- A summary of my position so far.
- From: John Jones
- Re: A summary of my position so far.
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: A summary of my position so far.
- From: Mitch Harris
- Re: A summary of my position so far.
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: A summary of my position so far.
- From: Mitch Harris
- A summary of my position so far.
- Prev by Date: Re: The Big Bug Theory
- Next by Date: Re: The Big Bang as grammatical faux pas
- Previous by thread: Re: A summary of my position so far.
- Next by thread: Re: A summary of my position so far.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|